1982
DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x00013728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for linguistic data in schizophrenia research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 218 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, Chaika (1974), for instance, showed that abnormal word associations, whatever else they may show about schizophrenia, do not explain the weird speech of some schizophrenic patients as speech is not normally produced on the basis of associations between semantically or phonologically related words. Chaika (1982 a ) showed that theories like faulty pigeonholing do not explain speech dysfunction as speech is not produced on the basis of pigeonholing.…”
Section: Confusion Between Language and Thoughtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, Chaika (1974), for instance, showed that abnormal word associations, whatever else they may show about schizophrenia, do not explain the weird speech of some schizophrenic patients as speech is not normally produced on the basis of associations between semantically or phonologically related words. Chaika (1982 a ) showed that theories like faulty pigeonholing do not explain speech dysfunction as speech is not produced on the basis of pigeonholing.…”
Section: Confusion Between Language and Thoughtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is contended here that although it in no way embraces all language behavior (cf. Buckingham 1982;Chaika 1982;Lecours 1982;Mancuso, Sarbin & Heerdt 1982), the evaluation of performance on tasks using individual words is a vital part of investigating this topic. Second, a reassessment of studies cited in the target article leads to a conclusion about such performance that is opposite to that put forth earlier: Specifically, the present conclusion is that semantic associational hierarchies are not intact among schizophrenic samples (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%