Accounting for metal bioavailability in assessing water quality: A step change?

Abstract

Abstract-Bioavailability of metals to aquatic organisms can be considered to be a combination of the physicochemical factors governing metal behavior and the specific pathophysiological characteristics of the organism's biological receptor. Effectively this means that a measure of bioavailability will reflect the exposures that organisms in the water column actually "experience". This is important because it has long been established that measures of total metal in waters have limited relevance to potential environmental risk. The concept of accounting for bioavailability in regard to deriving and implementing environmental water quality standards is not new, but the regulatory reality has lagged behind the development of scientific evidence supporting the concept. Practical and technical reasons help to explain this situation. For example, concerns remain from regulators and the regulated that the efforts required to change existing systems of metal environmental protection that have been in place for over 35 yr are so great as not to be commensurate with likely benefits. However, more regulatory jurisdictions are now considering accounting for metal bioavailability in assessments of water quality as a means to support evidence-based decision-making. In the past decade, both the US Environmental Protection Agency and the European Commission have established bioavailability-based standards for metals, including Cu and Ni. These actions have shifted the debate toward identifying harmonized approaches for determining when knowledge is adequate to establish bioavailability-based approaches and how to implement them. Environ Toxicol Chem 2016;35:257-265. # 2016 SETAC

A review of nickel toxicity to marine and estuarine tropical biota with particular reference to the South East Asian and Melanesian region

“…This is inconsistent with results for freshwater organisms where the pH dependency is reversed, i.e. nickel toxicity decreases with decreasing pH (Merrington et al 2016).…”

“…and the metal-species interaction at the biotic ligand/receptor (Merrington et al 2016). The specific mode of toxic action that a metal induces in an organism, and the organism's behaviour and metabolism (e.g.…”

A long‐term copper exposure in a freshwater ecosystem using lotic mesocosms: Invertebrate community responses

“…When results from our experiment conflicted with published ecotoxicological studies with copper, if sufficient water chemistry was reported, we used the Bio‐Met tool to adjust for copper bioavailability differences between study conditions . Bio‐Met is a simplified bioavailability calculator that approximates the biotic ligand modeling (BLM) used in the European Union Risk Assessment Report to calculate PNECs for copper as a function pH, DOC, and calcium concentrations in different waters .…”

How Specific Is Site‐Specific? A Review and Guidance for Selecting and Evaluating Approaches for Deriving Local Water Quality Benchmarks

“…Adjustments for water hardness are available for a number of metals, namely Cd, Cr(III), Cu, Pb, Ni, and Zn (Warne et al ). However, their appropriateness has been questioned due to 1) the limited, fish‐dominated, acute toxicity data upon which the relationships were established and 2) the fact that hardness is just one of several important toxicity modifying factors for these metals (e.g., Markich et al ; Merrington et al ). Not surprisingly, the USEPA () stated that the use of a multiple parameter bioavailability model such as the BLM (see next section) for Cu would result in a more appropriate WQC than would the hardness adjustment approach.…”