2014
DOI: 10.3386/w20707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for Post-Crisis Inflation and Employment: A Retro Analysis

Abstract: This research has been supported by the NSF grant SES-1227280. Harald Uhlig has an ongoing consulting relationship with a Federal Reserve Bank, the Bundesbank and the ECB. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publicati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the generally low correlation of the price shock process during the pre-crisis period, we see that its outcome is driven by a sequence of positive innovations during the crisis period. This …nding is in line with Fratto and Uhlig [73], who found that price markup shocks played an important role to avoid an even larger fall in in ‡ation during the crisis, and contributed to the slow decline in employment during the post-crisis recovery. 16 The wage markup shock process does not display any clear pattern after the pre-crisis period, but it is clear that its variance has increased since the end of the 1990s suggesting that the model provides a less accurate description of wage-setting behavior in the U.S. labor market since then.…”
Section: G O Vern M En T S P En D I N G S H O Ck P Ro Cesssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the generally low correlation of the price shock process during the pre-crisis period, we see that its outcome is driven by a sequence of positive innovations during the crisis period. This …nding is in line with Fratto and Uhlig [73], who found that price markup shocks played an important role to avoid an even larger fall in in ‡ation during the crisis, and contributed to the slow decline in employment during the post-crisis recovery. 16 The wage markup shock process does not display any clear pattern after the pre-crisis period, but it is clear that its variance has increased since the end of the 1990s suggesting that the model provides a less accurate description of wage-setting behavior in the U.S. labor market since then.…”
Section: G O Vern M En T S P En D I N G S H O Ck P Ro Cesssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Schorfheide [51] and Fratto and Uhlig [73]. These positive markup shocks disappear completely in our version of the SW-model, in which we implement the ZLB, and that feature an even higher degree of nominal stickiness.…”
Section: The Cost Channel Of …Nancial Spreads and In ‡Ation Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The set of competitors endogenously changes as it becomes profitable for new firms to export (Endogenous Entry assumption). By the Productivity Heterogeneity assumption, only the most productive 1 A non-exhaustive list of publications on that question includes Kohn (2006), Bernanke (2007), or, more recently, Ball and Mazumder (2011), Peach et al (2011), Gordon (2013), International Monetary Fund (2013), Fratto and Uhlig (2014), Coibion and Gorodnichenko (2015), Blanchard et al (2015). In a different approach, Gopinath et al (2012) also study the dynamic properties of prices over the business cycle, but they focus specifically on trade prices during the trade collapse -from August 2008 to March 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set of competitors endogenously changes as it becomes profitable for new firms to export (Endogenous Entry assumption). By the Productivity Heterogeneity assumption, only the most productive 1 A non-exhaustive list of publications on that question includes Kohn (2006), Bernanke (2007), or, more recently, Ball and Mazumder (2011), Peach et al (2011), Gordon (2013), International Monetary Fund (2013), Fratto and Uhlig (2014), Coibion and Gorodnichenko (2015), Blanchard et al (2015). In a different approach, Gopinath et al (2012) also study the dynamic properties of prices over the business cycle, but they focus specifically on trade prices during the trade collapse -from August 2008 to March 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%