2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for regional variation in both natural environment and human disturbance to improve performance of multimetric indices of lotic benthic diatoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When bioassessments are performed at large scales, e.g., at regional or national scales [8,9], although both natural environmental factors (e.g., temperature, precipitation, geology, and soils) and anthropogenic stressors change significantly, stressors gradients are usually strong enough to drive changes in biological patterns. Thus, significant stressor-response relationships can be developed, and major stressors affecting lotic ecosystems can be effectively detected while accounting for variation in natural environmental factors [10,11]. In contrast, when bioassessments are performed at the river system scale, associations between biological patterns and stressors are difficult to identify, because small-scale spaces may share similar features with natural environmental factors, resulting in relatively homogeneous background water chemistry [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When bioassessments are performed at large scales, e.g., at regional or national scales [8,9], although both natural environmental factors (e.g., temperature, precipitation, geology, and soils) and anthropogenic stressors change significantly, stressors gradients are usually strong enough to drive changes in biological patterns. Thus, significant stressor-response relationships can be developed, and major stressors affecting lotic ecosystems can be effectively detected while accounting for variation in natural environmental factors [10,11]. In contrast, when bioassessments are performed at the river system scale, associations between biological patterns and stressors are difficult to identify, because small-scale spaces may share similar features with natural environmental factors, resulting in relatively homogeneous background water chemistry [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an ongoing discussion on using planktonic or benthic diatoms to assess ecological conditions of streams and rivers (Kireta et al, 2012). Most studies on streams and wadable rivers have considered benthic diatoms because plankton is rare in such systems (Tang et al, 2016b;Pajunen et al, 2020). However, as planktonic and benthic algae seem to coexist in many rivers, our results may provide valuable information for such selection on which group to target the research efforts.…”
Section: Potential Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The algal periphyton system, in terms of similarity, diversity, evenness, structure, and dominance, has been employed in the construction of a variety of biological indices of both kinds [154][155][156]. There has been criticism regarding the processes, which reduces the indices to a single quantitative or qualitative result regarding its representational effect [157] due to seasonal variability [158][159][160][161] or regionality [162,163]. Despite the objections, this type of indices has been employed in many countries including the U.K., the U.S.A, Spain, and Canada.…”
Section: Biological Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%