2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2006.06.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for self-absorption in calculation of light collection in plastic scintillators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…shows comparison of simulated and experimental distributions of number of photoelectrons for three exemplary positions. A good agreement was obtained when scaling the absorption length of pure polystyrene[18] by factor of 0.55(Fig. 2).…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…shows comparison of simulated and experimental distributions of number of photoelectrons for three exemplary positions. A good agreement was obtained when scaling the absorption length of pure polystyrene[18] by factor of 0.55(Fig. 2).…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…(Thick line) The dependence of scintillator's absorption coefficient µ ef f on photon's wavelength. The effective coefficient µ ef f was determined by scaling the absorption coefficient of the pure polystyrene (Senchyshyn et al 2006) by factor of 1.8 (Kowalski et al 2015). (Thin line) Emission spectrum of the BC-420 plastic scintillator (Saint Gobain Crystals).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter, shown by thick solid line in Fig. 16, accounts effectively for the absorption of photons on the way to photomultipliers and was determined by scaling the absorption coefficient of pure polystyrene (Senchyshyn et al 2006) to the experimental results obtained with the single detection unit of the J-PET detector (Kowalski et al 2015). The scaling factor accounts effectively for the absorption due to the primary and secondary admixture in the scintillator material, imperfections of surfaces and reflectivity of the foil (Kowalski et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fig 6 emission spectra for the BC-420 and the J-PET scintillators are compared to the effective light absorption coefficient (blue dotted line) ( μ eff ) determined for the BC-420 scintillator strips with rectangular cross section of 7 mm x 19 mm [ 37 ]. It was established based on the absorption coefficient of pure polystyrene [ 38 ] and accounting for losses due to the transport of photons through the scintillator bar [ 37 ]. The decrease of the value of absorption coefficient with the growth of the wavelength indicates that the scintillation light for the J-PET scintillator will be less attenuated (with attenuation factor proportional to exp (− μ eff ) with respect to the BC-420 since the J-PET scintillator spectrum is extended toward higher wavelengths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%