2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019ja027254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for Variability in ULF Wave Radial Diffusion Models

Abstract: Many modern outer radiation belt models simulate the long‐time behavior of high‐energy electrons by solving a three‐dimensional Fokker‐Planck equation for the drift‐ and bounce‐averaged electron phase space density that includes radial, pitch‐angle, and energy diffusion. Radial diffusion is an important process, often characterized by a deterministic diffusion coefficient. One widely used parameterization is based on the median of statistical ultralow frequency (ULF) wave power for a particular geomagnetic ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(112 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both this paper and Thompson et al (2020) highlight that the distribution and variability time scales of diffusion coefficients are important for the evolution of electron phase space density due to diffusion. In other words, key details of the microphysical wave-particle interaction are important for accurate modeling of the macroscale radiation belt system, and the evolution of phase space density is not solely reliant on the average properties of the diffusion coefficients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both this paper and Thompson et al (2020) highlight that the distribution and variability time scales of diffusion coefficients are important for the evolution of electron phase space density due to diffusion. In other words, key details of the microphysical wave-particle interaction are important for accurate modeling of the macroscale radiation belt system, and the evolution of phase space density is not solely reliant on the average properties of the diffusion coefficients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Other evidence suggests it is important to understand the underlying distribution of diffusion coefficients. Idealized numerical experiments using a radial diffusion equation (Thompson et al., 2020) noted that the amount of diffusion depends upon the nature of the underlying distribution of diffusion coefficients. Those distributions with statistically heavier tails experienced greater diffusion, even when the distributions of diffusion coefficients had the same statistical average value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The L * value is calculated using the International Radiation Belt Environment Modeling (IRBEM) code (https://sourceforge.net/projects/irbem/) with the Tsyganenko and Sitnov (2005) magnetic field model for an equatorially trapped particle. It is noted that multiple methods for calculating L * values exist, and this is a source of additional variability to the statistical analysis (Thompson et al., 2020). It is also stressed that in a distorted and non‐dipolar magnetic field configuration, the L value and L * values are not directly comparable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that multiple methods for calculating L* values exist, and this is a source of additional variability to the statistical analysis (Thompson et al, 2020). It is also stressed that in a distorted and non-dipolar magnetic field configuration, the L value and L* values are not directly comparable.…”
Section: Power Spectral Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical experiments demonstrate that the solution of Fokker-Planck equation for the diffusion model is sensitively dependent on the temporal variability of the diffusion coefficient (Thompson et al, 2020;Watt et al, 2021), which will be affected by the spatial and temporal variations of the wave and plasma parameter. Watt et al (2021) performed multiple numerical experiments of bounce-averaged diffusion, and indicated that rapid variations (with timescales of ∼2 min) of whistler-mode wave diffusion coefficients resulted in solutions of the Fokker-Planck equations that were similar to results obtained from an averaged diffusion coefficient.…”
Section: Temporal Scale Size Of Chorus Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%