2011
DOI: 10.1080/09603107.2011.613756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting information and excess stock returns: the role of the cost of capital – new evidence from US firm-level data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The researchers determine that low quality of earnings increase information asymmetry, which lead to higher CEC (Aboody et al, 2005;García Lara et al, 2011). For instance, Apergis et al (2012) empirically investigate the influence of accounting information and the earnings quality on the cost of capital. According to authors higher quality represents higher precession of public disclosure; when lower level of private information minimizes gains obtained by privately informed investors.…”
Section: Accounting Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers determine that low quality of earnings increase information asymmetry, which lead to higher CEC (Aboody et al, 2005;García Lara et al, 2011). For instance, Apergis et al (2012) empirically investigate the influence of accounting information and the earnings quality on the cost of capital. According to authors higher quality represents higher precession of public disclosure; when lower level of private information minimizes gains obtained by privately informed investors.…”
Section: Accounting Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed academic research on cost of equity drivers on firm-level suggests that the overall macroeconomic conditions and in-house (internal) factors are powerful to explain the positive or negative views of corporate managers towards a specific financing strategy (Meluzin et al, 2018;Kljucnikov & Belas, 2016;Ng & Rezaee, 2015;Tran, 2014;Apergis et al, 2012;Daske et al, 2008;Easely & O'Hara, 2004;Geitzmann & Trombetta, 2003).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%