2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11156-018-0703-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting information quality and systematic risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
20
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The significance threshold of the standard variable of adjusted equity is the maximum in all the analyzed cases. Xing and Yan (Xing and Yan 2019) have developed an econometric model of multiplicative type in which the quality of the information system reduces the systemic risk. The model contains certain variables (size, ROA, leverage, net capital expenditures, R&D) to which a number of qualitative variables are added (market-to-book, sales Herfindhal, business segments, constant, observations) which reduce the validity of the model through their subjective assessment side.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance threshold of the standard variable of adjusted equity is the maximum in all the analyzed cases. Xing and Yan (Xing and Yan 2019) have developed an econometric model of multiplicative type in which the quality of the information system reduces the systemic risk. The model contains certain variables (size, ROA, leverage, net capital expenditures, R&D) to which a number of qualitative variables are added (market-to-book, sales Herfindhal, business segments, constant, observations) which reduce the validity of the model through their subjective assessment side.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Campbell et al [6] state that the systematic risks of individual stocks with similar accounting characteristics are primarily driven by the systematic risks of their fundamentals. Xing and Yan [7] indicate that improving accounting information quality causes the systematic risk to decrease, thus having important implications for disclosure decisions, portfolio management, and asset pricing.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Systematic Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can therefore be assumed that verification of non-financial reports on a broader scale should results in investors being better informed, and this in turn would improve the informational efficiency of financial markets. Moreover, Xing and Yan (2019) demonstrated that good quality accounting data limits the systematic risk in capital markets. Presumably, the same pertains to all disclosures concerning the activity of a company.…”
Section: Notion Of a Non-financial Report Audit And A Review Of The Literature Dedicated To This Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%