2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2011.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting logics, reconfiguration of ERP systems and the emergence of new accounting practices: A sociomaterial perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
96
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…AMT relates to the physical hardware of the manufacturing process and is defined as consisting of technological advancements in automation that is used in the production process (Wagner, Moll, and Newell, 2011). AMT allows an organization to obtain production systems with many forms of flexibility (Rao and Bargerstock, 2011).…”
Section: A Amt and Mais Strategic Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AMT relates to the physical hardware of the manufacturing process and is defined as consisting of technological advancements in automation that is used in the production process (Wagner, Moll, and Newell, 2011). AMT allows an organization to obtain production systems with many forms of flexibility (Rao and Bargerstock, 2011).…”
Section: A Amt and Mais Strategic Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals draw differently on their experience to transform and create different organizational patterns [33]. In this sense, an IS represents an adaptive assemblage of material and human components that assumes a practical meaning when it is used in a specific situated social and material context [45]. Best practice routines are not rooted in an IS, but rather are enacted by users that draw upon the software in their situated practices.…”
Section: The Sociomaterials Practice Perspective (Spp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the individual level, during the configuration and implementation process each team member forms his own perceptions about the new technology and the relevant knowledge that needs to be shared in order to collaborate. These perceptions are continuously adjusted according to the individual's values, assumptions, goals and aspirations [45], while using a new technology. The individual-level decisional events influence further how the user community in the organization uses the new technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the IT impact on the individual, work practices, or the organization, some researchers have posited that the technology needs to be seen as a sort of ''black box'' that moves on a linear trajectory from invention to diffusion and adoption (Orlikowski and Iacono, 2001). This view has been strongly questioned in the last two decades by a variety of scholars (e.g., Orlikowski, 2010;Wagner et al, 2011;Leonardi, 2011) who have argued that such a perspective ignores the reciprocal influence between technology and its social context of emergence. This shift towards a social way of studying the relationship between IT and organization has two important consequences: that technologies are subjective and adaptive.…”
Section: Studying Collaboration Technology Use As Subjective and Adapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, IT is an adaptive assemblage of a variety of material and human components (Vieru and Trudel, 2013). It assumes a practical meaning when it is used in a specifically situated social and material context (Wagner et al, 2011). The sociomaterial practice perspective (SPP) makes a distinctive move away from other theoretical frameworks, which look at either technology or human agency as a driver of change in structures and organizing.…”
Section: Studying Collaboration Technology Use As Subjective and Adapmentioning
confidence: 99%