1994
DOI: 10.1016/0167-7012(94)90039-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accucary of epifluorescence microscopy counts for direct estimates of bacterial numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar significant correlations (R 2 > 0.8) were also found in the north-western Mediterranean Sea (Lebaron et al, 1993(Lebaron et al, , 1998. Bacterial counts obtained by flow cytometry and microscopy were more similar in the Adriatic Sea than in the English Channel and replicate experiments in both investigated areas showed that coefficients of variation were lower for bacterial counts estimated by FCM than by microscopy ( Figure 4).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar significant correlations (R 2 > 0.8) were also found in the north-western Mediterranean Sea (Lebaron et al, 1993(Lebaron et al, , 1998. Bacterial counts obtained by flow cytometry and microscopy were more similar in the Adriatic Sea than in the English Channel and replicate experiments in both investigated areas showed that coefficients of variation were lower for bacterial counts estimated by FCM than by microscopy ( Figure 4).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…; std. dev) plot of bacterial abundance obtained by epifluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry from (A) the Adriatic Sea and (B) the English Channel Noted significant variations in bacterial abundance obtained by microscopy can be explained by the fact that presence of organic and mineral particles and the small sizes of most marine bacteria may result in lower bacterial discrimination (Lebaron et al, 1993;Gasol & Morán, 1999). Use of flow cytometry deals better with that problem because flow cytometer is separating bacteria from other particles on the basis of light scatter (size) and pigment content and has greater precision than microscopy counting (Sieracki et al, 1995;Monger & Landry, 1993;Joachimsthal et al, 2003;Chisholm et al, 1988).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For detection, a FACSCalibur flow cytometer with standard laser and optics was used. For calibration of side scatter and green fluorescence signals, and as an internal standard for cytometric counts and measures, fluorescent latex beads (1.58 µm diameter) were systematically added at a known abundance to each sample (28). The apparent nucleic acid structure was also evaluated, and the results included total bacteria, the bacteria with high apparent nucleic acid content (HNA) and the bacteria with low apparent nucleic acid content (LNA) (see 17, 14 for details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Counting was carried out after excitation at 490 nm and examination of 30 microscopic fields per slide. results are given for each experiment as the number of bacteria per mL of the original sample (LEBAroN et al, 1994;troUSSELLiEr et al, 1985).…”
Section: Cells Staining Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%