2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10995-008-0385-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acculturation and Depressive Symptoms Among Pregnant and Postpartum Latinas

Abstract: Higher acculturation, pregnancy and single status were positively associated with elevated depressive symptoms. Screening for depression during pregnancy is important for this population group, given Latinas' high rates of fertility and births to single women, particularly among more acculturated, U.S.-born Latinas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
78
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
78
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We considered the following variables as additional covariates in our models: maternal age at delivery, maternal PPVT score (continuous), maternal education (≤ 6 th grade vs. ≥ 7 th grade), marital status at enrollment, and using the Centers of Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) maternal depression (≥16 on CES-D) at the child’s 7-year visit (Davila et al, 2009). In addition, we considered covariates collected at each visit including housing density (number of persons per room), household poverty (<federal poverty level vs. ≥ federal poverty level) (Census, 2008), presence of father in the home (yes/no), maternal work status, location of neurodevelopmental assessment (field office or participant’s home), and season of assessment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered the following variables as additional covariates in our models: maternal age at delivery, maternal PPVT score (continuous), maternal education (≤ 6 th grade vs. ≥ 7 th grade), marital status at enrollment, and using the Centers of Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) maternal depression (≥16 on CES-D) at the child’s 7-year visit (Davila et al, 2009). In addition, we considered covariates collected at each visit including housing density (number of persons per room), household poverty (<federal poverty level vs. ≥ federal poverty level) (Census, 2008), presence of father in the home (yes/no), maternal work status, location of neurodevelopmental assessment (field office or participant’s home), and season of assessment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the role of these processes in perinatal mental health is not clear. Acculturation has been the cultural process most addressed in maternal mental health in Latinas (Beck 2006; Campos, Schetter, Walsh, & Schenker, 2007; Davila, McFall, & Cheng, 2009; Heilemann, Frutos, Lee, & Kury, 2004; Ruiz et al, 2012). The underlying theoretical framework of acculturation suggests those who are acculturating bring cultural and psychological characteristics with them to the new host culture (Berry, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the affective perspective of acculturation involves the emotional aspects of the acculturation process and emphasizes emotional well-being (Acevedo, 2000) and may contribute to psychological symptoms in the perinatal period. Most studies have focused on the role of acculturation in perinatal depression (Davila et al, 2009; Heilemann et al, 2004; Ruiz et al, 2012) with mixed results (Beck, 2006; D'Anna-Hernandez, Aleman, & Flores, 2015). These inconsistencies may be due to the use of proxy measures for acculturation, including variables such as birthplace, years in the host country, or language (Ortega, Rosenheck, Alegria, & Desai, 2000; Ruiz et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers use theories in the introduction section to guide their research but fail to discuss the results in light of the theory they used (i.e., Leidy, Parke, Cladis, Coltrane, & Duffy, 2009). Adversely, some researchers only mentioned the theory on their discussion section but not in their introduction section (i.e., Davila, McFall, & Cheng, 2009). In such cases, authors fail to use the theory to guide the study but discuss the results in light of the specific theory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%