Aversive stimuli not only support fear conditioning to their environmental antecedents, they also punish behaviors that cause their occurrence. The amygdala, especially the basolateral nucleus (BLA), has been critically implicated in Pavlovian fear learning but its role in punishment remains poorly understood. Here, we used a within-subjects punishment task to assess the role of the BLA in the acquisition and expression of punishment as well as aversive choice. Rats that pressed two individually presented levers for pellet rewards rapidly suppressed responding to one lever if it also caused footshock deliveries (punished lever) but continued pressing a second lever that did not cause footshock (unpunished lever). Infusions of GABA agonists baclofen and muscimol (BM) into the BLA significantly impaired the acquisition of this suppression. BLA inactivations using BM also reduced the expression of well-trained punishment. There was anatomical segregation within the BLA so that caudal, not rostral, BLA was implicated in punishment. However, when presented with punished and unpunished levers simultaneously in a choice test without deliveries of shock punisher, rats expressed a preference for unpunished over the punished lever and BLA inactivations had no effect on this preference. Taken together, these findings indicate that the BLA is important for both the acquisition and expression of punishment but not for aversive choice. This role appears to be linked to neurons in the caudal BLA, rather than rostral BLA, although the circuitry that contributes to this functional segregation is currently unknown, and is most parsimoniously interpreted as a role for caudal BLA in determining the aversive value of the shock punisher.Aversive reinforcement, such as delivery of footshock, can have two distinct consequences for learning and behavior. First, it supports learning about its environmental antecedents to imbue such stimuli with the ability to elicit conditioned responses. In this way, animals learn to fear a stimulus that signals occurrence of footshock and will express species-typical defense reactions upon subsequent presentations of that stimulus. Second, aversive reinforcement supports learning about its behavioral antecedents and alters the probability that these behaviors will be emitted again in the future. In this way, animals learn to withhold or reduce a behavior that causes delivery of footshock. These two consequences of aversive reinforcement, fear and punishment, are linked to the actions of different learning processes. Fear is due to the operation of Pavlovian conditioning and formation of associations between the CS and the shock US. Punishment is due to the operation of instrumental aversive learning and the formation of an association between a response and the shock punisher (Bolles 1975;Bolles et al.