2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2012.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accumulation and intense bioturbation of bioclastic muds along a carbonate-platform margin: Dry Tortugas, Florida

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conceptual complexity translates into a three‐layer subdivision of sediments on the basis of depth and frequency of burrowing events (Berger et al, ), rather than the more conventional subdivision of sediments into a mixed and an unmixed layer. These three layers are the following: the surface completely‐mixed layer (SML), typically dominated by biodiffusion; the incompletely‐mixed layer (IML), inhabited by deeper infauna, whose lower boundary is effectively the maximum burrowing depth (referred to as the transition layer in analyses of bioturbation fabric; Bentley & Nittrouer, ; Ekdale et al, ; Löwemark, ; Savrda et al, ); and a layer with no active mixing, representing the zone of final burial (Olszewski, ). This stratification is sensitive to the timescale over which mixing is measured (Maire et al, ; Smith et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conceptual complexity translates into a three‐layer subdivision of sediments on the basis of depth and frequency of burrowing events (Berger et al, ), rather than the more conventional subdivision of sediments into a mixed and an unmixed layer. These three layers are the following: the surface completely‐mixed layer (SML), typically dominated by biodiffusion; the incompletely‐mixed layer (IML), inhabited by deeper infauna, whose lower boundary is effectively the maximum burrowing depth (referred to as the transition layer in analyses of bioturbation fabric; Bentley & Nittrouer, ; Ekdale et al, ; Löwemark, ; Savrda et al, ); and a layer with no active mixing, representing the zone of final burial (Olszewski, ). This stratification is sensitive to the timescale over which mixing is measured (Maire et al, ; Smith et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach also has drawbacks because low sedimentation rates and bioturbational mixing typically generate time‐averaged assemblages (Anderson et al ., ; Scarponi & Kowalewski, ; Tomašových & Kidwell, ; Scarponi et al ., ) that can be inert to the most recent changes in ecosystem composition (Kidwell, , ). This inertia effect can be especially pronounced in carbonate environments with inherently low sedimentation rates and deep bioturbation (Kosnik et al ., , ; Bentley & Nittrouer, ). In this study, the effect of low sedimentation rate and bioturbational mixing on the temporal resolution of death assemblages is considered through dating a large number of shells (Tomašových & Kidwell, ; Tomašových et al ., ) and by using living assemblages as indicators of the most recent conditions unaffected by mixing (Kidwell, ; Tomašových et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming relatively high sedimentation rates close to 1 cm/yr, that is, values close to the upper estimates of sedimentation rates on continental shelves (Sommerfield 2006), the twentieth-century sedimentary record will be captured in ~100-cm-long sediment cores. Such thickness is frequently affected by bioturbation reaching several decimeters or even a few meters below the sediment–water interface (Bentley and Nittrouer 2012; Parsons-Hubbard et al 2014). Stratigraphic patterns can be deconvolved to pre-bioturbation signals (Hull et al 2011; Steiner et al 2016) but such approaches require information on depth-dependent changes in bioturbation and can be limited under very slow sedimentation rate and high mixing (Schiffelbein 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%