1995
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1995.1105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accumulation and Partitioning of Dry Matter in Taro [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
12
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
12
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the TDM which is dominated by the corm and suckers dry matter gradually accumulated until the final harvest at 175 DAP. Therefore, the TDM accumulation of Samoa 1 and Samoa 2 cultivars of taro is in accordance with the other studies on taro conducted elsewhere (Goenaga, 1995;Sivan, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, the TDM which is dominated by the corm and suckers dry matter gradually accumulated until the final harvest at 175 DAP. Therefore, the TDM accumulation of Samoa 1 and Samoa 2 cultivars of taro is in accordance with the other studies on taro conducted elsewhere (Goenaga, 1995;Sivan, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The PDM of Samoa 1 accumulated over time from 4.8 to 94.95 g/plant during the 35 to 140 DAP time period while the petioles dry matter for Samoa 2 also increased from 6.8 to 119.9 g/plant at 35 to 140 DAP. The above results are similar to the results of PDM by other researchers whereby the PDM increased from planting until at least 100 DAP and then declining afterwards (Amosa, 1993;Goenaga, 1995;Sivan, 1976). …”
Section: Petioles Dry Matter (Pdm)supporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The wide range of maturity time for taro may be associated with the lack of a clear definition of the stage of maturity, because of the crop's indeterminate growth habit (Singh et al, 1998). Harvest maturity in taro has been defined variously to include corm quality or average or maximum yield attainment (Miyasaka et al, 2003), change in corm shape (Jacobs & Clarke, 1993), cormel: corm ratio (Goenaga, 1995) and phenostage (Jacobs & Clarke, 1993). Despite the lack of consistency in determining a cominonly accepted harvest-maturity stage for taro, leaf area development has been generally used as an indicator of vegetative growth (Reynolds, 1977;Onwueme & Johnston, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%