2014
DOI: 10.1038/srep05292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accumulation of humic-like fluorescent dissolved organic matter in the Japan Sea

Abstract: Major fraction of marine dissolved organic matter (DOM) is biologically recalcitrant, however, the accumulation mechanism of recalcitrant DOM has not been fully understood. Here, we examine the distributions of humic-like fluorescent DOM, factions of recalcitrant DOM, and the level of apparent oxygen utilization in the Japan Sea. We find linear relationships between these parameters for the deep water (>200 m) of the Japan Sea, suggesting that fluorescent DOM is produced in situ in the Japan Sea. Furthermore, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
68
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(118 reference statements)
12
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fluorophore also corresponded to a fluorophore that was found to be microbial recalcitrant FDOM with the time scale of the thermohaline circulation (Yamashita and Tanoue, 2008). Fluorescent components similar to H2 were obtained through parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) of FDOM from the open ocean and were found to be related to apparent oxygen utilization in the deep ocean (Jørgensen et al, 2011; Tanaka et al, 2014), implying that H2 produced by A. macleodii is possibly recalcitrant DOM. On the other hand, peak M was produced by phytoplankton isolates (Romera-Castillo et al, 2010) and consumed partially by bacterial communities (Romera-Castillo et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This fluorophore also corresponded to a fluorophore that was found to be microbial recalcitrant FDOM with the time scale of the thermohaline circulation (Yamashita and Tanoue, 2008). Fluorescent components similar to H2 were obtained through parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) of FDOM from the open ocean and were found to be related to apparent oxygen utilization in the deep ocean (Jørgensen et al, 2011; Tanaka et al, 2014), implying that H2 produced by A. macleodii is possibly recalcitrant DOM. On the other hand, peak M was produced by phytoplankton isolates (Romera-Castillo et al, 2010) and consumed partially by bacterial communities (Romera-Castillo et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Notably, in Shimotori’s incubation studies (Shimotori et al, 2009), this fluorophore appeared in EEMs during the period of increasing bacterial abundance but disappeared from EEMs during the period of decreasing bacterial abundance. In the open ocean, this fluorophore is generally not present (Jørgensen et al, 2011; Tanaka et al, 2014). Thus, A. macleodii may be one of the key species that produces this fluorophore, and this fluorophore might be consumed by other microbes in natural environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In open ocean surface waters, the fluorescence signature of humics appear to be best related to oxygen utilization and chlorophyll a concentrations as a result of in-situ production (Stolpe et al, 2014), hence a biologically-mediated distribution has been proposed (Yamashita et al, 2010;Tanaka et al, 2014;Catala et al, 2016). In this case, the peak in ligand concentrations associated with higher stocks of phytoplankton and bacteria could be associated with HS-like produced by biological excretion.…”
Section: Humicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also a region known to be associated with phenolic fluorescence. (Murphy et al, 2006), 8 (Murphy et al, 2014), 9 (Murphy et al, 2008), 22 (Kothawala et al, 2012), 26 (Stedmon et al, 2011b), 28 (Stedmon et al, 2007), 29 (Stedmon and Markager, 2005), 31 (Søndergaard et al, 2003), 32 (Jørgensen et al, 2011), 33 , 34 (Stedmon and Markager, 2005), 35 (Osburn and Stedmon, 2011), 37 (Walker et al, 2009), 39 (Yamashita et al, 2011), 41 (Yamashita et al, 2010a), 44 (Yamashita et al, 2010b), 47 (Kowalczuk et al, 2009), 48 (Graeber et al, 2012), 53 (Kothawala et al, 2013), 54 (Osburn et al, 2012), 55 , 64 (Walker et al, 2013), 68 (Tanaka et al, 2014), 69 (Lapierre and del Giorgio, 2014).…”
Section: Parallel Factor Analysis (Parafac)mentioning
confidence: 99%