1987
DOI: 10.1071/sr9870193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accumulation of plant nutrients and changes in soil properties of sandy soils under fertilized pasture in southeastern South-Australia .I. Phosphorus

Abstract: The accumulation of phosphorus applied as superphosphate over a 25-year period to pastures growing on sand over clay soils was measured in three areas of different rainfall in the south-east of South Australia. Total soil phosphorus levels increased in the 0-10 cm, 10-30 cm and 30 cm-clay layers for all areas, but no accumulation occurred in the clay layer. For every 100 kg ha-1 of single superphosphate (9.6% phosphorus) applied, 2.0, 3.2 and 3.5 kg ha-1 of phosphorus accumulated in the 0-10 cm layer for the H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other potential errors besides spatial variability include an overestimation of the bulk density and thus total P storage in 1979, a loss of P-rich topsoil through water and/or wind erosion that would have affected the sampled soil depth, and an erroneous P content of the superphosphate fertiliser, possibly resulting in lower P applications than planned. There is thus no clear evidence that P was lost from the system through leaching, in contrast to observations of leaching losses of 43-69% of P fertiliser in sandy soils under pasture in South Australia (Lewis et al 1987).…”
Section: Calculated P Budgets and Measured P Recovery In 0-020 Mmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, other potential errors besides spatial variability include an overestimation of the bulk density and thus total P storage in 1979, a loss of P-rich topsoil through water and/or wind erosion that would have affected the sampled soil depth, and an erroneous P content of the superphosphate fertiliser, possibly resulting in lower P applications than planned. There is thus no clear evidence that P was lost from the system through leaching, in contrast to observations of leaching losses of 43-69% of P fertiliser in sandy soils under pasture in South Australia (Lewis et al 1987).…”
Section: Calculated P Budgets and Measured P Recovery In 0-020 Mmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In pasture systems where removal of P in produce is low, addition of P (mostly as single superphosphate) has led to significant increases in soil organic matter content, total nitrogen, total P and sulfur (S) (Donald and Williams 1954;Williams and Donald 1957;Lewis et al 1987;McLaughlin et al 1990). In permanent pastures, much of this P accumulates in the top 2-4 cm of the soil profile (Table 1), making pasture species growing on these soils very susceptible to P deficiency induced by surface drying (Pinkerton and Simpson 1986).…”
Section: Accumulation Of Phosphorus In Australian Agricultural Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a slow release P fertiliser will be more suitable for slow growth perennial species. Furthermore, slow release P fertilisers may improve PUE of pastures growing in highrainfall areas and/or on coarse-textured soils where dissolved P can be lost via leaching (Yeates et al 1984;Lewis et al 1987).…”
Section: Placement To Improve Puementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, P loss by leaching and runoff from arable lands is a small component of applied P (1.8–2%), aside from in soils with a poor P retention capacity (Lewis et al, 1987; Sims et al, 1998; Melland et al, 2008). Reducing P loss is attracting more attention for environmental protection compared with improving P use efficiency.…”
Section: Challenges Arising From Overapplication Of Phosphorus Fertilmentioning
confidence: 99%