Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 1984
DOI: 10.2973/dsdp.proc.74.117.1984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accumulation Rates in Leg 74 Sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
33
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
8
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A numerical age determined for the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary horizon by interpolation from the magnetic C-29R boundaries and by extrapolation downward using the C-29N and upward using the C-30N boundary varies between about 66.3 and 66.5 m.y. This is in complete agreement with other recent estimates based on the same time scale (Berggren et al, in press;Shackleton et al, 1984).…”
Section: Site 577supporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A numerical age determined for the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary horizon by interpolation from the magnetic C-29R boundaries and by extrapolation downward using the C-29N and upward using the C-30N boundary varies between about 66.3 and 66.5 m.y. This is in complete agreement with other recent estimates based on the same time scale (Berggren et al, in press;Shackleton et al, 1984).…”
Section: Site 577supporting
confidence: 94%
“…In both holes the boundary is located within the interval of reversed polarity that separates the marine magnetic Anomalies 29 and 30, denoted as the C-29R subchron in the presently used nomenclature. Worldwide, the same result was obtained from analyses of various marine sections (Alvarez et al, 1977;Alvarez and Lowrie, 1978;Hsü et al, 1982;Shackleton et al, 1984;Thierstein, 1982 and references therein). As pointed out by Thierstein (1982), the relative position of the paleontological boundary within the magnetic C-29R subchron is highly variable in different pelagic sequences, indicating major changes in sedimentation rate and/or the possible presence of hiatuses.…”
Section: Site 577supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Continuous deterioration of Neogene climate in the high latitudes and the expansion of the Antarctic surface water mass essentially drove out calcareous nannoplankton. However, a few early-middle Pleistocene species of calcareous nannofossils were found on Berggren et al (1985); d ; e Shackleton et al (1984); f Monechi and Thierstein (1985).…”
Section: Reticu Zygrhimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ages of several of the key lower Eocene nannofossil datums used here resulted from a study of DSDP Leg 74 cores (taken in the South Atlantic) (Shackleton, 1984) that employed the new magnetic-anomaly time scale of . At Sites 527 and 528, the percent of core recovery and the position of magnetic anomalies in relation to the recovered section suggest that the identification of Anomalies 21, 22, and 23 are correct.…”
Section: Ages Of Nannofossil Datums; Sediment Accumulation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Sites 527 and 528, the percent of core recovery and the position of magnetic anomalies in relation to the recovered section suggest that the identification of Anomalies 21, 22, and 23 are correct. Within this interval, the following nannofossil datums and their ages were determined (Shackleton, 1984): the first occurrences of Nannotetrina fulgens (= N. quadrata) at 49.5 Ma and Discoaster sublodoensis at 51.7 Ma; and the last occurrence of Tribrachiatus orthostylus at 54.0 Ma. Below Anomaly 23, and especially in the reversed interval between Anomalies 23 and 24, the dating of events is less certain, owing to changes in sedimentation rate, to low magnetic inclinations, and to lack of data.…”
Section: Ages Of Nannofossil Datums; Sediment Accumulation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%