2010
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-28-1571-2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy analysis of the GPS instrumental bias estimated from observations in middle and low latitudes

Abstract: Abstract. With one bias estimation method, the latituderelated error distribution of instrumental biases estimated from the GPS observations in Chinese middle and low latitude region in 2004 is analyzed statistically. It is found that the error of GPS instrumental biases estimated under the assumption of a quiet ionosphere has an increasing tendency with the latitude decreasing. Besides the asymmetrical distribution of the plasmaspheric electron content, the obvious spatial gradient of the ionospheric total el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While several techniques exist for determining these biases, one must take care in their application in regions outside their initial design [Lanyi and Roth, 1988;Ma and Maruyama, 2003;Ma et al, 2005;Rideout and Coster, 2006;Arikan et al, 2008]. Recent studies have attempted to characterize variabilities in these biases estimated through single-station approaches using real data and simulations [Ciraolo et al, 2007;Mazzella, 2009;Zhang et al, 2009;Brunini and Azpilicueta, 2010;Zhang et al, 2010;Conte et al, 2011;Coster et al, 2013]. These studies highlight the need to understand not only the nature of true bias variability but also the impact of the fundamental assumptions made in standard bias estimation techniques on bias estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several techniques exist for determining these biases, one must take care in their application in regions outside their initial design [Lanyi and Roth, 1988;Ma and Maruyama, 2003;Ma et al, 2005;Rideout and Coster, 2006;Arikan et al, 2008]. Recent studies have attempted to characterize variabilities in these biases estimated through single-station approaches using real data and simulations [Ciraolo et al, 2007;Mazzella, 2009;Zhang et al, 2009;Brunini and Azpilicueta, 2010;Zhang et al, 2010;Conte et al, 2011;Coster et al, 2013]. These studies highlight the need to understand not only the nature of true bias variability but also the impact of the fundamental assumptions made in standard bias estimation techniques on bias estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the model's error in terms of both MAE and RMSE is comparable to 3 TECu that in turn, is comparable to the TEC measurement error at middle latitudes (e.g. Zhang et al, 2010 and references therein). Significant improvement (>10%) over climatology is recorded in both cases.…”
Section: Swif's Empirical Formulation For the Vtec Forecastmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…We used the data with satellite elevation larger than 30 • to minimize the errors caused by converting slant TEC into vertical TEC and the multipath effects. B s r was the main error source of the ionospheric TEC deriving from GPS observation and could reach up to several TECU (1 TECU = 10 16 electrons m −2 ) or even larger than the real slant TEC (Sardón and Zarraoa, 1997;Zhang et al, 2010), and the effect of this biases must be removed to get the absolute measurements of TEC. Here, we eliminated the B s r by combining the vertical TEC time series (VTEC) with the JPL GIM data which was interpolated in both space and time.…”
Section: Multichannel Maximum-entropy Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%