1990
DOI: 10.1080/08905459008915677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy Analysis of the Semi-Analytical Method for Shape Sensitivity Calculation∗

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that case, it is desirable to look for simpler examples with similar characteristics. For example, Barthelemy and Haftka (1990) became aware of the accuracy problems of the semi-analytical method for shape sensitivity of static response when calculating derivatives of car finite element models. They looked for a simple problem that would illustrate the difficulty and found that it could be reproduced with a cantilever beam.…”
Section: Structuring Research So That It Is Easily Reproducedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that case, it is desirable to look for simpler examples with similar characteristics. For example, Barthelemy and Haftka (1990) became aware of the accuracy problems of the semi-analytical method for shape sensitivity of static response when calculating derivatives of car finite element models. They looked for a simple problem that would illustrate the difficulty and found that it could be reproduced with a cantilever beam.…”
Section: Structuring Research So That It Is Easily Reproducedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is addressed in the work of Wang et al [Wang and Poh (2018)]. Despite the fact that SA approach is computationally efficient and popular, the accuracy of the sensitivity analysis can be relatively unsatisfactory for some special cases [Barthelemy and Haftka (1990)].…”
Section: Semi-analytical (Sa) Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mahnken and Stein (1996) and Cooreman et al (2007) applied such procedure in the case of viscoplastic and elastice plastic constitutive models, respectively. Some authors proposed other determination schemes such as the mixed technique based on the semi-analytical method using the finite differentiation and analytical derivatives (Massoni et al, 2002;Barthelemy and Haftka, 1990), or adjoint methods (Bonnet, 1999;Tortorelli and Michaleris, 1994).…”
Section: Selection Of the Parameter Identification Strategy For Supermentioning
confidence: 99%