2011
DOI: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31821221cd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and efficacy of narrow-band imaging versus white light hysteroscopy for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia

Abstract: NBI showed significantly higher values in sensitivity for the detection of low-risk and high-risk hyperplasia, and this could be useful for reducing the risk of missing severe pathologies at hysteroscopy, and improving the diagnosis of preneoplastic and neoplastic pathologies. NBI hysteroscopy showed a very high diagnostic accuracy for the exploration of the uterine cavity, reducing the number of biopsies performed in wrong areas, although multicenter randomized trials are required to establish the true value … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that it is important to determine the extent by which NBI diagnostic accuracy depends on surgeon experience, and accuracy can be improved by learning. Like other studies, our study demonstrated that significant improvement in the diagnostic accuracy of NBI was possible after training [11][12][13]. The kappa values of inter-observer agreement were better for NBI than were seen for WLH after training of those students who had some hysteroscopy experience prior to training.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…We believe that it is important to determine the extent by which NBI diagnostic accuracy depends on surgeon experience, and accuracy can be improved by learning. Like other studies, our study demonstrated that significant improvement in the diagnostic accuracy of NBI was possible after training [11][12][13]. The kappa values of inter-observer agreement were better for NBI than were seen for WLH after training of those students who had some hysteroscopy experience prior to training.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Kisu et al (2011) found that the sensitivity of diagnosis of AEH or EC was significantly higher using white light + NBI compared to white light only, without a decline in the specificity of diagnosis. In a large-scale multicenter study, Tinelli et al (2011) found that NBI significantly improved the sensitivity (60% vs. 20%, P < 0.005) and positive predictive value (67% vs. 25%, P < 0.001) compared with white light only for diagnosis of high-risk hyperplasia, with no differences in specificity, negative predictive value, and accuracy. These reports indicate that NBI may be a useful procedure to complement a hysteroscopic examination, and NBI may become established in standard clinical practice in the near future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1999, the year in which it was developed, NBI has proven to be reliable in the identification of lesions in the initial phase, otherwise not diagnosable, in different anatomic areas such as the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, colorectal tract, the bronchial tree, and urogenital tract, with percentages of sensitivity and specificity ranging from 70% to 100% and 61% to 92.3%, respectively. In these fields, classifications of various vascular patterns identified with NBI technique still exist and allow the preoperative prediction of the nature of the lesion …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%