1974
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1974.tb03975.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and precision of a scanning and integrating microinterferometer

Abstract: Summary Instrumental factors affecting the precision and accuracy of measurements with the Vickers M86 scanning and integrating microinterferometer were investigated. ‘Spot’ measurements of OPD (optical path difference) could be made to a precision better than 0.001 Λ (wavelengths); the coefficient of variation of scanning measurements of IOPD (integrated OPD) depended on the object, typical values being approximately ± 5% for a human erythrocyte in water, and ± 10% for a mouse sperm head in water. Repeated me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principles and use of this instrument have been described by Goldstein & Hartmann-Goldstein (1974). When the instrument is operated, it produces a result which represents the integrated optical path difference (o.p.d.)…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principles and use of this instrument have been described by Goldstein & Hartmann-Goldstein (1974). When the instrument is operated, it produces a result which represents the integrated optical path difference (o.p.d.)…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of the section taken (76.5 + 6 5 nm (S.D.)) was checked by interferometry using a Vickers M86 scanning and integrating microinterferometer (Goldstein & Hartmann-Goldstein, 1974).…”
Section: Tissue Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If plane separation corresponds to section thickness t (or some multiple of it), various options are available for its estimation. They include Small's fold method, microinterferometry, micrometry and section re-sectioning (for a selection of methods, see Goldstein & Hartmann-Goldstein, 1974;Weibel, 1979;Gundersen et al, 1983;Braendgaard & Gundersen, 1986;Bedi, 1987;de Groot, 1988b;Evans & Howard, 1989). The need to estimate section separation can be avoided by" adopting a suitable two-step sampling design which combines application of the double disector (Braendgaard & Gundersen, 1986;Gundersen et al, 1988) with the Cavalieri principle (Gundersen & Jensen, 1987).…”
Section: Physical Disectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%