2020
DOI: 10.1177/1932296820930038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and Precision of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Hospitalized Patients Undergoing Radiology Procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18,116 Glucose monitoring devices should also be removed for certain procedures-with each company having their own list-such as MRI and diathermy. 117 Results from small clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes have suggested that real-time continuous glucose monitoring can be used successfully to improve glycaemic control in the hospital setting. 118,119 Reports during the COVID-19 pandemic have described the potential promise of using real-time continuous glucose monitoring in realworld hospital settings for remote inpatient diabetes management in non-ICU [120][121][122] and ICU patients.…”
Section: Point-of-care Testing and Continuous Glucose Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,116 Glucose monitoring devices should also be removed for certain procedures-with each company having their own list-such as MRI and diathermy. 117 Results from small clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes have suggested that real-time continuous glucose monitoring can be used successfully to improve glycaemic control in the hospital setting. 118,119 Reports during the COVID-19 pandemic have described the potential promise of using real-time continuous glucose monitoring in realworld hospital settings for remote inpatient diabetes management in non-ICU [120][121][122] and ICU patients.…”
Section: Point-of-care Testing and Continuous Glucose Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects undergoing MRI were excluded, given concerns about the potential impact of magnetic fields on CGM function and safety. 25 Recently, Thomas et al exposed G6 sensor/ transmitter pairs to X-rays to simulate a radiotherapeutic procedure and to radiofrequency and magnetic fields to simulate diagnostic MRI. 26 Consistent with the clinical observations, 25 the devices appear unlikely to be affected by X-irradiation used in imaging studies, except during MRI.…”
Section: When Should We Be Concerned About Biological Imaging or Otmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Recently, Thomas et al exposed G6 sensor/ transmitter pairs to X-rays to simulate a radiotherapeutic procedure and to radiofrequency and magnetic fields to simulate diagnostic MRI. 26 Consistent with the clinical observations, 25 the devices appear unlikely to be affected by X-irradiation used in imaging studies, except during MRI. 26 Simulated MRI conditions, however, created displacement force, minimal heating, and current in sensor/transmitter pairs.…”
Section: When Should We Be Concerned About Biological Imaging or Otmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance may vary by glucose levels with higher values leading to more bias and less precision. Areas affecting accuracy and opportunities for improvement include, Preanalytical: such as pressure on sensor site, 130 X Rays, 131 lipohypertrophy, 132 Analytical: Interfering substances, 133,134 end-stage renal disease/dialysis, 135 and Postanalytical: hardware (parakeet, nightrider), software (Nightscout, Looping, tomato), and data analysis (human error). 136,137 Accuracy may even be more important for patients at high risk of hypoglycemia such as those with hypoglycemic unawareness.…”
Section: Consensusmentioning
confidence: 99%