Accuracy and Precision of Four Value-Added Blood Glucose Meters: the Abbott Optium, the DDI Prodigy, the HDI True Track, and the HypoGuard Assure Pro

Abstract

The Abbott Optium was significantly more accurate than the other meter systems, whereas the HDI True Track was significantly less accurate and less precise compared to the other meter systems.

Transcutaneous Glucose Sensing by Surface-Enhanced Spatially Offset Raman Spectroscopy in a Rat Model

“…Measurements that fall in zone A are considered clinically accurate measurements, in zone B they lead to benign or no action by the patient, in zone C they lead to unnecessary action, in zone D they lead to a lack of action when glucose value correction is necessary, and, finally, in zone E they lead to actions that are opposite to those that are clinically necessary. Accurate sensing only results in data points within the A and B ranges of the grid 26 Figure 3A. shows a Clarke error grid analysis from in vivo transcutaneous SESORS glucose measurements.…”

Accuracy Evaluation of Five Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems: The North American Comparator Trial

“…11 However, none of these studies included the EZ meter. Study design differences could account for the apparent discordant results reported in these studies compared with the current analysis.…”

Study of glucose concentration influence on blood optical properties in THz frequency range

“…This experiment contained samples with the following glucose concentrations shown in Table 1. The glucose concentrations in the blood were measured twice per a sample using Abbott Freestyle Optium [26] glucometer. This instrument shows concentration in values of mmol/l standard, which can be converted to mg/dl by multiplication by 18.…”