2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26948-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and Precision of Tidal Wetland Soil Carbon Mapping in the Conterminous United States

Abstract: Tidal wetlands produce long-term soil organic carbon (C) stocks. Thus for carbon accounting purposes, we need accurate and precise information on the magnitude and spatial distribution of those stocks. We assembled and analyzed an unprecedented soil core dataset, and tested three strategies for mapping carbon stocks: applying the average value from the synthesis to mapped tidal wetlands, applying models fit using empirical data and applied using soil, vegetation and salinity maps, and relying on independently … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
104
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
16
104
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean sediment carbon density in vegetated sites averaged 0.034 ± 0.011 g C org cm −3 , similar to both the conterminous U.S. mean of 0.027 ± 0.013 g C org cm −3 (Holmquist et al, 2018a) and the global mean of 0.039 ± 0.003 g C org cm −3 for tidal wetlands (Chmura et al, 2003). The mean carbon burial rate within the high marshes/scrub-shrubs of all estuaries, 81 ± 36 g C org m −2 yr −1 , was additionally comparable to the global burial flux of 91 ± 19 g C org m −2 yr −1 (IPCC, 2013; Figure 5d).…”
Section: Blue Carbon Burial Ratessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Mean sediment carbon density in vegetated sites averaged 0.034 ± 0.011 g C org cm −3 , similar to both the conterminous U.S. mean of 0.027 ± 0.013 g C org cm −3 (Holmquist et al, 2018a) and the global mean of 0.039 ± 0.003 g C org cm −3 for tidal wetlands (Chmura et al, 2003). The mean carbon burial rate within the high marshes/scrub-shrubs of all estuaries, 81 ± 36 g C org m −2 yr −1 , was additionally comparable to the global burial flux of 91 ± 19 g C org m −2 yr −1 (IPCC, 2013; Figure 5d).…”
Section: Blue Carbon Burial Ratessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Carbon content averaged 13.9 ± 0.5%, and carbon densities averaged 0.0270 ± 0.0009 g C/cm 3 (Unger et al, ; Table S2), yielding a total POC load from the marsh complex to the estuary of 1,291 Mg C/year. Note that this carbon density value matches the CONUS‐wide carbon density estimate of Holmquist et al ().…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Therefore, some assumptions are necessary for estimating and comparing OC burial rates between the MH and 210 Pb techniques. We assumed that the OC density of the MH cores was the same as that of the 210 Pb cores, which is supported by both regional and national observations that OC density in tidal wetlands does not have a depth trend (Breithaupt et al, 2014;Holmquist et al, 2018). Therefore, if the MH accretion rate was 50% of the 210 Pb accretion rate for the corresponding time interval, we assumed that the MH OC burial rate was also 50% of the 210 Pb OC burial rate.…”
Section: Comparing Oc Burial Rates With 210 Pb and Mhsmentioning
confidence: 93%