2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and reproducibility of automated white matter hyperintensities segmentation with lesion segmentation tool: A European multi-site 3T study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed in the literature, WML segmentation of age-related, mild loads is a challenging problem with the low detection rates in the 30% range as opposed to the > 80% range seen with large WML loads (> 15 mL). In this study, the average Dice index was lower than 0.5 for all automatic methods, in line with the current state of the literature 25 , 29 , 45 , 50 , 51 and not as promising as segmentation of the typically large multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions reported in the literature 22 . The main cause of low indices is likely missed segmentations in parts of the brain that contain high density white matter fibers, with small intensity differences between the white matter lesions and background normal white matter fibers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As discussed in the literature, WML segmentation of age-related, mild loads is a challenging problem with the low detection rates in the 30% range as opposed to the > 80% range seen with large WML loads (> 15 mL). In this study, the average Dice index was lower than 0.5 for all automatic methods, in line with the current state of the literature 25 , 29 , 45 , 50 , 51 and not as promising as segmentation of the typically large multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions reported in the literature 22 . The main cause of low indices is likely missed segmentations in parts of the brain that contain high density white matter fibers, with small intensity differences between the white matter lesions and background normal white matter fibers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Roura et al 25 introduced the SALEM-LS (SLS) algorithm, which uses an adaptive outlier algorithm to threshold outliers as WML from grey matter, ranking first on this dataset with a total score of 82.34. The Lesion Prediction Algorithm (LPA) developed by Schmidt et al 26 – 28 was based on logistic regression and successfully applied to the longitudinal analysis of WML recently 29 . Vanderbecq and colleagues 30 recommended both the SLS and LPA algorithms as reasonable first choice WML segmentation tools after comparison and validation of seven different algorithms in their recent study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the spatial relationships between brain functional connectivity and structural changes require further exploration in our future research. Finally, further studies employing more advanced imaging methodologies to map the brain connectome and segment lesions appropriately and precisely may provide more comprehensive insights into the connectome-based mechanisms underlying ILA-related cognitive impairment ( Ribaldi et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a first step, the LST (Schmidt et al, 2012 ) FLAIR segmentation software was applied to all 2D FLAIR images. Despite LST being considered accurate and a strong performer in comparative studies (Heinen et al, 2019 ; Ribaldi et al, 2021 ; Vanderbecq et al, 2020 ), a small but significant fraction of the results inevitably contained some inaccurate or unsatisfactory segmentation (Figure S2 ). While we could simply review all images and discard these failed cases, this would risk losing some interesting corner‐cases, which would run contrary to our goal of robustness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%