2018
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.000651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and reproducibility of the Etest to detect drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae to contemporary treatment

Abstract: Overall, the Etest method yielded reproducible MIC values within each laboratory with the azithromycin and ceftriaxone MIC results consistent to the reference agar dilution method while the cefixime result tended to provide a lower MIC value.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted using Etest strips on GCB-K plates, comparable MIC values to the agar dilution method, with the exception of cefixime for which Etests systemically report lower MICs[56]. In brief, cells from overnight plates were suspended in trypticase soy broth to a 0.5 McFarland standard and inoculated onto new GCB-K plates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted using Etest strips on GCB-K plates, comparable MIC values to the agar dilution method, with the exception of cefixime for which Etests systemically report lower MICs[56]. In brief, cells from overnight plates were suspended in trypticase soy broth to a 0.5 McFarland standard and inoculated onto new GCB-K plates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papp et al . have previously shown that MICs using gradient diffusion for CFX were consistently underreported by one or two dilutions [ 8 ]. Liu et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolates for both azithromycin and ciprofloxacin test panels were selected to be representative of the known diversity within the gonococcal population. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted using Etest strips (40) or the agar dilution method (32), and MICs were recorded after 24 h of growth. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) defines azithromycin reduced susceptibility as MICs of Ն1 g/ml (41), while GISP uses a breakpoint of Ն2 g/ml (32).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%