2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy assessment of ASTER, SRTM, ALOS, and TDX DEMs for Hispaniola and implications for mapping vulnerability to coastal flooding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
53
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In areas with varied topography, the performance of LiDAR-derived DEMs is more accurate and more precise when compared to the output from satellite-derived DEMs. These results align with previous studies that compare the results obtained from LiDAR-derived DEMs versus globally available satellite-derived DEMs (Vaze et al, 2010;Boulton and Stokes, 2018;Zhang et al, 2019). In our analysis, the accuracy and precision of the LiDAR-derived valley bottom extent was higher in both steep topographic settings with well-defined single-channel rivers, and in the mild-slope, laterally unconfined topographic settings where channels are absent or discontinuous (e.g.…”
Section: Delineating Valley Bottom Extent Using An Objective-based Apsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In areas with varied topography, the performance of LiDAR-derived DEMs is more accurate and more precise when compared to the output from satellite-derived DEMs. These results align with previous studies that compare the results obtained from LiDAR-derived DEMs versus globally available satellite-derived DEMs (Vaze et al, 2010;Boulton and Stokes, 2018;Zhang et al, 2019). In our analysis, the accuracy and precision of the LiDAR-derived valley bottom extent was higher in both steep topographic settings with well-defined single-channel rivers, and in the mild-slope, laterally unconfined topographic settings where channels are absent or discontinuous (e.g.…”
Section: Delineating Valley Bottom Extent Using An Objective-based Apsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The inability of satellite-derived DEMs to precisely model more subtle topographic variability is well documented (Boulton and Stokes, 2018;Zhang et al, 2019). Further, discontinuities in the valley bottom polygon for headwater regions were exaggerated using satellite-derived DEMs as these were originally of 30m resolution compared to the LiDAR-derived DEM which was originally of 5m resolution.…”
Section: Delineating Valley Bottom Extent Using An Objective-based Apmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies investigated the accuracy of TanDEM-X World DEM ™ with elevation models from SRTM and ASTER Global DEM [55][56][57]. Others compared the accuracy of SRTM, ASTER GDEM, ALOS World 3D and TanDEM-X World DEM ™ for coastal relief settings [26,58] or for relative small areas [59,60]. They all showed a relative high performance of the TanDEM-X World DEM ™ which is mostly superior to the accuracy of the 30 m global DEMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This DEM product is a new generation global DEM providing resolution of 0.4 arc second which can be seen as one of the most consistent, highly accurate and completest global DEM data sets of the Earth surface. Global assessment summarised by [57][58][59] reports overall vertical accuracy below 2 m which is subject to land cover and surface slope angle on local scale.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Freely Available Dem Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%