2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31808-0_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy Assessment of CBCT-Based Volumetric Brain Shift Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparently, the outlier detection of the registration framework successfully ignores the streak artifacts, making the streak correction in the vessel segmentation not strictly necessary, while the few true vessels that are accidentally removed, are informative for finding the correct transformation. We also validated the method of Smit-Ockeloen et al [8], which has a mean registration error of 2.89 mm -slightly worse than ours. A more detailed look at the results (Fig.…”
Section: Registrationmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Apparently, the outlier detection of the registration framework successfully ignores the streak artifacts, making the streak correction in the vessel segmentation not strictly necessary, while the few true vessels that are accidentally removed, are informative for finding the correct transformation. We also validated the method of Smit-Ockeloen et al [8], which has a mean registration error of 2.89 mm -slightly worse than ours. A more detailed look at the results (Fig.…”
Section: Registrationmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Since the preprocessing part was adopted from [8], we only validate the more challenging intra-operative cortex segmentation here. We found that, over all images, the mean distance between manual and automatic cortex segmentation was 1.05 mm.…”
Section: Results and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations