2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-05438-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy improvement of robotic machining based on robot’s structural properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Equations (3)(4)(5)(6), in addition to analysis the deformation influence coefficient, reducing the deformation of the components which has weak stiffness is another way to improve the machining accuracy. A comparative experiment is designed that Thomson PC25 series linear electric cylinder is selected to replace the original BXTL150 electric cylinders, as shown in the Figure 7.…”
Section: Cooling Mode Nonementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Equations (3)(4)(5)(6), in addition to analysis the deformation influence coefficient, reducing the deformation of the components which has weak stiffness is another way to improve the machining accuracy. A comparative experiment is designed that Thomson PC25 series linear electric cylinder is selected to replace the original BXTL150 electric cylinders, as shown in the Figure 7.…”
Section: Cooling Mode Nonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al [4] designed a novel six degrees-of-freedom (DOF) hybrid kinematic machine for polishing. Janez et al [5] described an approach to improve the robot's accuracy based on its structural properties which considering manipulability, structural stiffness, structure inertial, damping ratios, and natural frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al [4] designed a novel six degrees-of-freedom (DOF) hybrid kinematic machine for polishing. Janez et al [5] described an approach to improve the robot's accuracy based on its structural properties which considering manipulability, structural stiffness, structure inertial, damping ratios, and natural frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To optimize the stiffness of the robot along a trajectory, the stiffness of the robot throughout the workspace must be known. The following two main methods have evolved to determine the stiffness of the robot: global and local [29]. The advantage of the global approach is the ability to capture nonlinear effects due to friction and transmission losses, while the disadvantage is that the model does not generalize well to the entire workspace of the robot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%