2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12225-019-9813-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy in the identification of orchids of the genus Angraecum by taxonomists and non-taxonomists

Abstract: The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification errors may have affected our results (Mackay‐Smith & Roberts, 2019), but are unlikely to have had the same influence as spatial inconsistencies (Maldonado et al, 2015) such as sampling and specimen collection biases (e.g., along roadsides) (Oliveira et al, 2016). There is yet to be an automated method to detect identification errors within occurrence data due to the complex science of plant names (Thomson et al, 2018) therefore manual checks are still required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Identification errors may have affected our results (Mackay‐Smith & Roberts, 2019), but are unlikely to have had the same influence as spatial inconsistencies (Maldonado et al, 2015) such as sampling and specimen collection biases (e.g., along roadsides) (Oliveira et al, 2016). There is yet to be an automated method to detect identification errors within occurrence data due to the complex science of plant names (Thomson et al, 2018) therefore manual checks are still required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As currently estimated, 350,510 described plant species names are accepted in the world (WFO, 2021). Species identification mainly depends on taxonomists and their work, yet even for specialists, species identification is not always straightforward (Mackay‐Smith & Roberts, 2019). Even worse, experts in species identification are dwindling rapidly, with training pipelines shrinking due to a variety of structural reasons broadly referred to as the “taxonomic impediment” (Engel et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…plastid genome, super-barcodes, recently diverged, Schima, standard barcodes straightforward (Mackay-Smith & Roberts, 2019). Even worse, experts in species identification are dwindling rapidly, with training pipelines shrinking due to a variety of structural reasons broadly referred to as the "taxonomic impediment" (Engel et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, our dataset and subsequent analysis incorporated some herbarium specimen identification as they were originally recorded. Based on our expertise (but also Mackay-Smith and Roberts (2019) ), it is important to note that such identifications can carry a substantial margin of error, with higher discrepancies observed for more intricate genera (e.g. Liparis Rich.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%