2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy investigation of height obtained from Classical and Network RTK with ANOVA test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Gumus et al (2016) found that 'classical' single base RTK levels were more accurate than NRTK. It appears that the 'classical' RTK in Gumus et al's study was a base-rover setup.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Gumus et al (2016) found that 'classical' single base RTK levels were more accurate than NRTK. It appears that the 'classical' RTK in Gumus et al's study was a base-rover setup.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Studies comparing the vertical accuracy of NRTK to traditional RTK have been performed in various European countries such as Latvia (Dobelis & Zvirgzds 2016), Spain (Garrido et al 2011) and Turkey (Gumus et al 2016). However, as errors are network dependent the results of these studies cannot be applied to the CORSnet-NSW network.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and to send the corrections to long distances in real time. This system consists of 3 or more stable stations that make continuous observations [13,14]. NRTK necessitates an ambiguity resolution "engine" to fix integer ambiguities in static multiple reference receivers in stations with known positions to form the network [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the linear interpolation method, the coefficients a and b are determined according to the least squares method by Equation (12).…”
Section: Linear Interpolation Methods (Lin)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, tropospheric delay can cause errors in the height component up to several cm for RTK positioning [12]. The error increases when the regional meteorological conditions notably change, and differences up to 3-4 cm may occur, depending on the season.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%