2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of a cut-off value based on the third molar index: Validation in an Australian population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
3
Order By: Relevance
“…50 , showed some better performance of the test, specificity was 100.0% in both sexes with sensitivity of 90.6% and 90.9% and accurate classification of 94.5% and 95.1% in females and males respectively while performance in our study was better than in Australian study, by Franklin et al 22 , they showed sensitivity of 90% in both sexes, specificity of 88% and 85% and accurate classification of 88% and 87% in females and males respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…50 , showed some better performance of the test, specificity was 100.0% in both sexes with sensitivity of 90.6% and 90.9% and accurate classification of 94.5% and 95.1% in females and males respectively while performance in our study was better than in Australian study, by Franklin et al 22 , they showed sensitivity of 90% in both sexes, specificity of 88% and 85% and accurate classification of 88% and 87% in females and males respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Later the specific cut-off value of I3M <0.08 has been tested for different populations [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] , which further confirmed its applicability and reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sensitivity values were reported to be over 95% in Turkish males (128 boys from 293 total sample) (Gulsahi et al 2016), Colombians (288 children), (De Luca et al 2016), and Serbians (598 cases) (Zelic et al 2016). Meanwhile, it was 88% in Botswana (1294 individuals) (Cavrić et al 2016) and 90% in Australians (143 cases) (Franklin et al 2016). Unfortunately, sensitivity was only 52% in the Saudi population (300 cases) (AlQahtani et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%