2019
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.4478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Acetabular Component Positioning Using Computer-assisted Navigation in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract: Background Appropriate component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is imperative for long-term survivorship. C-arm fluoroscopy provides visual guidance in the direct anterior approach (DAA), but it is limited by qualitative properties. Conversely, imageless computer-assisted navigation systems (CAS) provide surgeons with intraoperative, three-dimensional (3D) quantitative measurements for cup position, although the accuracy of such systems has not been extensively addressed in the DAA. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The handheld navigation cohort clearly demonstrated the accuracy of its intraoperative assessment, with cup placement within 1.8° for inclination and 3.2° for version of the postoperative assessment. These results suggest similar accuracy compared to a study involving the Intellijoint navigation system (Intellijoint HIP; Intellijoint Surgical, Inc., Waterloo, ON, Canada), which found differences of 4.3° and 4.2° of inclination and version, respectively, between intraoperative and postoperative assessments [ 11 ]. Redmond et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The handheld navigation cohort clearly demonstrated the accuracy of its intraoperative assessment, with cup placement within 1.8° for inclination and 3.2° for version of the postoperative assessment. These results suggest similar accuracy compared to a study involving the Intellijoint navigation system (Intellijoint HIP; Intellijoint Surgical, Inc., Waterloo, ON, Canada), which found differences of 4.3° and 4.2° of inclination and version, respectively, between intraoperative and postoperative assessments [ 11 ]. Redmond et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Different from CT-based navigation, some imageless navigation systems were also developed to improve cup positioning in THA (138,139). Furthermore, augmented reality technology has also been used as a powerful alternative to the current navigation system for cup placement (140)(141)(142).…”
Section: Challenges and Future Prospects In Radiographic Assessment Of The Cup Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the cup position, several tools can be utilized, including intraoperative navigation, computer software based on C-arm imaging, or C-arm techniques [ 34 ]. Cup anteversion can be more difficult to quantify than inclination and plays a significant role in preventing instability in patients with hip-spine pathology [ 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%