2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Acoustic Analysis Measurements in the Evaluation of Patients With Different Laryngeal Diagnoses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
23
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the unquestionable improvement in patients' vocal quality, no statistically significant results were obtained in the acoustic evaluation before and after treatment, probably due to the small sample size and also because each acoustic parameter was analysed separately [33,34]. Furthermore, these results are in agreement with the literature, which considers that perceptive evaluation is actually the most valid and reliable measure to evaluate voice quality [35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Despite the unquestionable improvement in patients' vocal quality, no statistically significant results were obtained in the acoustic evaluation before and after treatment, probably due to the small sample size and also because each acoustic parameter was analysed separately [33,34]. Furthermore, these results are in agreement with the literature, which considers that perceptive evaluation is actually the most valid and reliable measure to evaluate voice quality [35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Analysis of the combined acoustic measures in the discrimination of the predominant voice quality again revealed that the GNE measure appeared in all acceptable combinations found. The F 0 measure was present in most of the combinations when discriminating predominant voice quality, which attests to the results found in previous studies (8,13,18,29,30) in which the fundamental frequency appeared to be an interesting measure when discriminating voice quality. This is probably because it is related, in physiological terms, to the neuromuscular condition and vocal fold mucosa vibration regularity, and in acoustic and perceptual terms, it is directly related to the sound signal periodicity (6,9,11,30) .…”
Section: Traditional Acoustic and Formantic Measures In The Discriminsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The general grade and roughness seem to be parameters more related to F 0 (28,30) . The mean F 0 values are higher both in general grade and in vocal tension, and the F 0 standard deviation values are also high in rough voices.…”
Section: Traditional Acoustic and Formantic Measures In The Discriminmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shimmer value is associated to voice quality [2][3][4][5][6][7], state of mind [8][9][10][11][12][13], age [14] and gender [15] of people. There are many research works that use shimmer (among other measures) with goals ranging from pathologies detection [6,16,17] to the improvement of human-machine interfaces through the estimation of the intensionality of a spoken phrase [19]. Regarding synthesized voices, Yamasaki et al show in [18] that a certain shimmer level increases the degree of naturalness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%