1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6300(1997)9:1<73::aid-ajhb10>3.0.co;2-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of anthropometric estimation of muscle cross-sectional area of the arm in males

Abstract: Mid‐arm cross‐sectional muscle area was studied in several domains to evaluate nutritional status and muscle area and hypertrophy in revalidation and strength‐related studies. In this study, anthropometrically determined muscle + bone area formulas were validated against Houndsfield unit‐based CT‐scan measures at mid‐humerus (stretched and relaxed), and mid‐humerus ‐3 and ‐6 cm positions in 75 healthy male twins. Muscle + bone area estimates calculated by mid‐arm circumference and the triceps skinfold (MBA.ANg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subjects were instructed to perform the lunge at the maximal speed possible. Martine et al (1997) and Knapik et al (1996) formulas. For kinematics measurements, a ten-camera system was employed (BTS SMART DX 7000, BTS Bioengineering, Milan, Italy) with a sampling frequency of 250 Virtual markers (midpoint between the ASIS, midpoint of ankle, knee, elbow and wrist, midpoint between the 1st and the 5th metatarsophalangeal joints) were computed post acquisition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjects were instructed to perform the lunge at the maximal speed possible. Martine et al (1997) and Knapik et al (1996) formulas. For kinematics measurements, a ten-camera system was employed (BTS SMART DX 7000, BTS Bioengineering, Milan, Italy) with a sampling frequency of 250 Virtual markers (midpoint between the ASIS, midpoint of ankle, knee, elbow and wrist, midpoint between the 1st and the 5th metatarsophalangeal joints) were computed post acquisition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absolute and % fat mass (FM) and fat free mass (FFM) were assessed via bioelectrical impedance (Maltron BF906, Rayleigh, GB), and the body mass index was calculated. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the forward upper arm was calculated using the formula of Martine et al [12], while the CSA of the thighs was calculated with the formulas of Knapik et al [13].…”
Section: Anthropometrymentioning
confidence: 99%