2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Computer-Navigated Total Hip Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All surgeries were performed using hip navigation. The high accuracy of the navigation tool was also confirmed in several other studies (Beckmann et al 2009;Hohmann et al 2011bHohmann et al , 2011cLin et al 2011;Moskal and Capps 2011;Snyder et al 2012). Confalonieri and coworkers performed a match-pair study between computer-assisted and freehand techniques using a short modular femoral stem (Confalonieri et al 2008).…”
Section: Evidence Of Benefits Using Navigationsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All surgeries were performed using hip navigation. The high accuracy of the navigation tool was also confirmed in several other studies (Beckmann et al 2009;Hohmann et al 2011bHohmann et al , 2011cLin et al 2011;Moskal and Capps 2011;Snyder et al 2012). Confalonieri and coworkers performed a match-pair study between computer-assisted and freehand techniques using a short modular femoral stem (Confalonieri et al 2008).…”
Section: Evidence Of Benefits Using Navigationsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Radiological analysis illustrated an average cup inclination of 43° and a leg length discrepancy in the range of ±5 mm in 99% of cases, showing the benefit of the navigation tool (Gebel et al 2012). Snyder and colleagues evaluated the accuracy of a particular imageless computer navigation system in determining cup position (Snyder et al 2012). They assessed surgical time, clinical outcome, dislocation rate, limb length, and offset in 44 patients and concluded that computer-assisted techniques allowed for easier management of limb length discrepancy and offset restoring.…”
Section: Evidence Of Benefits Using Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has been shown to improve the accuracy and reproducibility of component position compared to manual techniques [7,9,11,20,[22][23][24]. Many CAS systems for THA reference the anterior pelvic plane (APP), a spatial plane defined by bilateral anterior-superior iliac spines (ASIS) and the pubic tubercle, to determine acetabular component anteversion [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contemporary imageless hip navigation system, the frontal anatomical pelvic plane is used as a reference for measuring the cup inclination and anteversion. For this, a pelvic tracking device is applied by 3 pins just proximal to the anterior superior iliac spine and the left, right, and symphysis pubis were registered in the computer using the sharp pointer [21]. If additional small tracking device could be applied to the osteotomized fragment, the exact planned rotation of the osteotomized fragment could be possible in the operation field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%