2020
DOI: 10.1002/jper.20-0222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of cone‐beam computed tomography is limited at implant sites with a thin buccal bone: A laboratory study

Abstract: Background: To evaluate whether buccal bone thickness (BBT), implant diameter, and abutment/crown material influence the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to determine the buccal bone level at titanium implants. Methods: Two implant beds (i.e., narrow and standard diameter) were prepared in each of 36 porcine bone blocks. The implant beds were positioned at a variable distance from the buccal bone surface; thus, resulting in three BBT groups (i.e., >0.5 to 1.0; >1.0 to 1.5; >1.5 to 2.0 mm). In h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present case, where a pneumocephalus developed during submucosal debridement of a peri-implantitis lesion with an airpolishing device, the following pathway for the intracranial entrance of the air is suspected based on the localization of air, registered in the diagnostic CT taken after the procedure. Based on this CT scan, and although it is acknowledged that the detection of a thin buccal bone wall in CT/CBCT scans is largely inaccurate (Domic et al, 2021), it appears that the implant in position 27 had an intact buccal bone at its marginal aspect (Figure 6a). However, it had a very deep periimplant bone defect at its mesial aspect, extending almost to the apex of the implant, that is, into the augmented sinus space (Figure 6b,c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the present case, where a pneumocephalus developed during submucosal debridement of a peri-implantitis lesion with an airpolishing device, the following pathway for the intracranial entrance of the air is suspected based on the localization of air, registered in the diagnostic CT taken after the procedure. Based on this CT scan, and although it is acknowledged that the detection of a thin buccal bone wall in CT/CBCT scans is largely inaccurate (Domic et al, 2021), it appears that the implant in position 27 had an intact buccal bone at its marginal aspect (Figure 6a). However, it had a very deep periimplant bone defect at its mesial aspect, extending almost to the apex of the implant, that is, into the augmented sinus space (Figure 6b,c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Shiratori et al 12 found no significant difference between measurements on CBCT and gold standard measurements. Domic et al 13 conclude that reliability of CBCT measurements of BBL are dependent on BBT. Lower BBT resulting in less reliable measurements of BBL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it has been suggested that the dimension of bone structures measuring less than 1 mm might be underestimated when using CBCT, 36 due to the fact that an accuracy of greater than 0.5 mm cannot be expected 38 . More recently, Domic and colleagues concluded that detection of the buccal bone level around implants is largely inaccurate in cases where the buccal bone is ≤1 mm thick 41 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%