2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04205-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of different navigation systems for femoral and tibial implantation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomised comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The laxities of the native knee are not uniform throughout the arc of motion [ 34 ], further suggesting that manual gap balancing techniques may not adequately address imbalances, thus emphasizing the need for a fresh look at soft tissue balancing [ 35 ]. Navigation provides data on a numerical gap, measured laterally and medially in flexion and extension before cuts are made, usually displayed in millimeters [ 36 ]. During a robotic-assisted procedure, the leg is physically manipulated to stress the collaterals in flexion and extension to assess the gap balancing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The laxities of the native knee are not uniform throughout the arc of motion [ 34 ], further suggesting that manual gap balancing techniques may not adequately address imbalances, thus emphasizing the need for a fresh look at soft tissue balancing [ 35 ]. Navigation provides data on a numerical gap, measured laterally and medially in flexion and extension before cuts are made, usually displayed in millimeters [ 36 ]. During a robotic-assisted procedure, the leg is physically manipulated to stress the collaterals in flexion and extension to assess the gap balancing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies support these findings. Saiki et al report that the learning curves between a different imageless CAS and an acceleration-based navigation system for TKA converged within five cases after introduction of these systems into surgical workflow, with ultimate average surgical times of 87.8 min and 87.4 min, respectively [ 30 ]. Meyer et al report that mean surgery duration for navigated TKA was 6 min longer than for conventional TKA [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preoperative variables included patient’s age, sex, body mass index, operated side, primary disease (osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis), history of ipsilateral knee procedure, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), FTA, active/passive knee flexion ROM, active/passive knee extension ROM, comfortable/maximum gait speed, and Japanese Orthopedic Association score. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score, an orthopedic method for assessing physical function, consists of 100 points, with higher scores indicating better function [ [21] , [22] , [23] ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%