1983
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.1983.325163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Dipole Localization with a Spherical Homogeneous Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the calculation of the lead field L ⌽ the reciprocal source current was set to 1 A which can be done due to the linearity of the problem by scaling the potential field by the applied current (Eq. [1]). This current varies in our model because the current source is set up using constant voltage between the source nodes and the Ohm's law.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Lead Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For the calculation of the lead field L ⌽ the reciprocal source current was set to 1 A which can be done due to the linearity of the problem by scaling the potential field by the applied current (Eq. [1]). This current varies in our model because the current source is set up using constant voltage between the source nodes and the Ohm's law.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Lead Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three different dipole directions (x, y, and z) according to the Cartesian coordinate system shown in the figure were considered for each dipole location. a few cases (Temporal 1, Central 3, and Posterior 4) random noise (1,5,10,20, and 30%) was added to the potentials. The sensitivity of the dipole localization to the changes in the tissue resistivities was demonstrated by setting the resistivity values of the CSF to 0.56 Ωm (35) and the skull to 160.0 Ωm when calculating the surface potentials of three dipoles (Temporal 3, Central 5, and Posterior 2).…”
Section: Calculation Of the Surface Potentials-simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the Monte Carlo approach the best sensor conhguration is chosen by comparing simulation results on several conhgurations (Cufhn, 1985;Gaumond, Lin, & Geselowitz, 1983;Hari, Joutsiniemi, & Sarvas, 1988;Huizenga & Molenaar, 1994;Ogura & Sekihara, 1993). This is very time consuming, and therefore not very useful in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%