1987
DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1987.48.325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of drinkers' recall of alcohol consumption in a field setting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This short time duration may not have been sufficient for residual mouth alcohol to clear, likely resulting in overestimated readings (Spector, 1971). In a replication of this study in college-aged drinkers (Meier, Brigham, & Handel, 1987), estimated BAC derived from self-report information was compared to Breathalyzer™ readings. Subjects with low BACs were significantly more accurate in recalling consumption as compared to subjects with high BACs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This short time duration may not have been sufficient for residual mouth alcohol to clear, likely resulting in overestimated readings (Spector, 1971). In a replication of this study in college-aged drinkers (Meier, Brigham, & Handel, 1987), estimated BAC derived from self-report information was compared to Breathalyzer™ readings. Subjects with low BACs were significantly more accurate in recalling consumption as compared to subjects with high BACs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, evidence shows that the validity of self-reports about alcohol use varies according to respondents' age [13], gender [14,15] and drinking frequency and quantity [16,17]. Research has also found that although Arab Israelis are less likely to drink, among current drinkers, Israeli Arabs are more likely to drink heavily than Israeli Jews [19,20,21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In effect, attention has shifted away from examining whether self-reported alcohol measures are valid per se, to examining what factors affect the validity of self-reported alcohol use [6]. Evidence shows that even when a satisfactory degree of validity in alcohol use self-reports is established, it varies noticeably according to respondents' age [13], gender [14,15] and drinking frequency and quantity [16,17]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QFI was calculated by multiplying these two ratings, as described by Knowles and Schroeder (1990). Such estimates of alcohol consumption have been shown to be highly accurate in college student populations (Meier, Brigham & Handel, 1987).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%