Accuracy of Five Different Diagnostic Techniques inMild‐to‐Moderate Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) compared with the diagnosis of PID made by laparoscopy, endometrial biopsy, transvaginal ultrasound, and cervical and endometrial cultures. Study design: A diagnostic performance test study was carried out by cross-sectional analysis in 61 women. A group presenting PID (n = 31) was compared with a group (n = 30) presenting another cause for non-specific lower abdominal pain (NSLAP). Diagnosis provided by an evaluated method was compared with a standard diagnosis (by surgical findings, histopathology, and microbiology). The pathologist was unaware of the visual findings and presumptive diagnoses given by other methods. Results: All clinical and laboratory PID criteria showed low discrimination capacity. Adnexal tenderness showed the greatest sensitivity. Clinical diagnosis had 87% sensitivity, while laparoscopy had 81% sensitivity and 100% specificity; transvaginal ultrasound had 30% sensitivity and 67% specificity; and endometrial culture had 83% sensitivity and 26% specificity. Conclusions: Clinical criteria represent the best diagnostic method for discriminating PID. Laparoscopy showed the best specificity and is thus useful in those cases having an atypical clinical course for discarding abdominal pain when caused by another factor. The other diagnostic methods might have limited use.

Effectiveness and Adverse Events of Early Laparoscopic Therapy versus Conservative Treatment for Tubo-Ovarian or Pelvic Abscess: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

“…If patients do not respond by 48-72 h or if the mass persists after standard antibiotic therapy, surgical treatments are required. Antibiotic treatment fails in 12-76% of patients with pelvic abscess [8,9,16,17]. In a study by Topcu et al [5], 79.8% (87/109) patients were managed surgically or discharged after 7 days of antibiotic therapy.…”

Intrauterine nitric oxide in pelvic inflammatory disease

“…Laparoscopy is one established way to reach a correct diagnosis, although the overall diagnostic accuracy of this method is also unsatisfactory (32). A weakness of laparoscopy is that it will not detect endometritis and may not identify intratubal inflammation (33). Moreover, laparoscopy is an invasive technique that necessitates hospitalization and general anesthesia.…”

Pelvic inflammatory disease in the adolescent

“…One classic study [30] found a wide range of reliability in PID diagnosis comparing clinical findings, laparoscopy, transvaginal ultrasound, endometrial biopsy, and endometrial culture (Table 1). Current research is evaluating the possibility of microbiota existing in the upper genital tract in a physiologic state and its potential link to PID [31].…”