Accuracy of High Explosive Data used for Reactive Burn Model Calibration

Abstract

Reactive burn models for a high explosive (HE) have three components: an equation of state (EOS) for the products, an EOS for the reactants and a reaction rate. For the products, we discuss the uncertainty in data for the planar detonation state and its release isentrope. For the reactants, the uncertainty in the principal shock locus data is discussed. For the reaction rate, we discuss uncertainties in shock initiation data (distance-of-run to detonation as a function of shock pressure), and curvature effect data (detonation speed as a function of front curvature). An important source of uncertainty for calibrating the reaction rate for a plastic-bonded explosive (PBX) results from variations in heterogeneities; that is the mesoscale structure of HE grains, binder and porosity. This shows up in the scatter of both shock initiation data and curvature effect data with small changes in initial density and initial temperature, and systematic changes with PBX lot. As illustrative examples, we use data for the conventional HMX based PBX 9501 and the insensitive TATB based PBX 9502 since these explosives have been extensively studied and high quality data are readily available in the literature.

A simplified burn model for simulating explosive effects and afterburning

“…However, RB models require a calibrated set of input parameters for the reactant equation of state (EOS), product EOS, and reaction rate. Calibration of the reactant EOS and reaction rate requires significant empirical input [19][20][21], which are unavailable for many materials. RB models require full numerical resolution of the reaction zone of the detonation, which is undesirable and impractical for afterburning applications.…”