1992
DOI: 10.1016/0141-5425(92)90080-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of intramedullary alignment in total knee replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This seems to be in accordance with the amount of axis deformations typically found in patients prior to TKA. The degree of flexion and rotation over the knee joint both affect the coronal alignment on whole-leg standing films [16,17]. However, Wright et al concluded that rotation of the lower limb <10°did not have a significant effect on measurement of tibiofemoral alignment [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seems to be in accordance with the amount of axis deformations typically found in patients prior to TKA. The degree of flexion and rotation over the knee joint both affect the coronal alignment on whole-leg standing films [16,17]. However, Wright et al concluded that rotation of the lower limb <10°did not have a significant effect on measurement of tibiofemoral alignment [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the positioning of the limb, morphological variations in the femur and tibia, the quality of radiographs and the use of long or short films. 7,9,10,12,[14][15][16][17][18] Lonner et al 7 concluded that limb rotation and knee flexion of 10°, either alone or in combination, significantly affected radiological measurements of anatomical alignment. Wright et al, 16 however, showed that the effect on axial alignment was minimal within 10° of rotation and that radiological measurement was reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elloy [3] studied the accuracy of a system using intramedullary alignment: The mean error was 0.67°of valgus deviation from the mechanical axis; the maximum error was 6.68°v algus and 4.62°varus. Ritter [15] assessed the anatomic alignment: Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed significantly worse results in the varus group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%