2011
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(11)60295-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of MRI to Assess Therapeutic Responses and Mucosal Healing in Crohn's Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ordàs et al used the MaRIA score to monitor response to therapy in 27 patients after 12 weeks of corticosteroid or adalimumab therapy (CDEIS was used as the reference standard). 73 A MaRIA score below 40 predicted endoscopic remission with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 85%. Van Assche et al followed up 15 patients on infliximab therapy by performing MRI enteroclysis at weeks 2 and 26.…”
Section: Mrimentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ordàs et al used the MaRIA score to monitor response to therapy in 27 patients after 12 weeks of corticosteroid or adalimumab therapy (CDEIS was used as the reference standard). 73 A MaRIA score below 40 predicted endoscopic remission with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 85%. Van Assche et al followed up 15 patients on infliximab therapy by performing MRI enteroclysis at weeks 2 and 26.…”
Section: Mrimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In particular, once clinical remission had been achieved, there was no significant difference in the mean contrast enhancement between CD patients and controls, but intestinal segments remained thicker in CD patients in remission than in healthy controls. Ordàs et al used the MaRIA score to monitor response to therapy in 27 patients after 12 weeks of corticosteroid or adalimumab therapy (CDEIS was used as the reference standard) 73. A MaRIA score below 40 predicted endoscopic remission with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 85%.…”
Section: Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical practice, IBD and especially CD are commonly evaluated by endoscopy for mucosal assessment and by magnetic resonance (MR) for transmural lesions [12] , [13] Numerous studies both in humans and animals have correlated MR images with severity of endoscopic lesions [12] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] . Whereas MR evaluation of inflammation is easy and becoming routine practice, assessment of fibrosing lesions is more challenging [13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51,52 Rather, evidence suggests that deep remission (ie, full mucosal healing) should be the goal of therapy. 51,52,57 Numerous studies have demonstrated that mural and mesenteric disease may still underlie a healed mucosa on endoscopy. 54,55 Reduction in the signs of active inflammation (wall thickening, hyperenhancement, and T2 prolongation) may prove to be superior in assessing treatment response rather than clinical symptoms alone and could serve as a benchmark when developing new drugs.…”
Section: Limitations Of Mrementioning
confidence: 99%