2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Optical Coherence Tomography in the Evaluation of Neointimal Coverage After Stent Implantation

Abstract: Subtle differences in neointimal formation induced by current DES can be reproducibly analyzed in vivo by OCT. However, OCT measurement of stent area seems to have less correlation with histology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
86
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
86
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…EEL, external elastic lamina. examining intra-and inter-observer variabilities in the present OFDI measurement, as previously described, 22 confirming the high reproducibility of the measurements (Tables S3,S4). .…”
Section: Ofdi Acquisition In Patients In Vivosupporting
confidence: 87%
“…EEL, external elastic lamina. examining intra-and inter-observer variabilities in the present OFDI measurement, as previously described, 22 confirming the high reproducibility of the measurements (Tables S3,S4). .…”
Section: Ofdi Acquisition In Patients In Vivosupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Although biologically plausible and intuitively accepted by the scientific community, this approach cannot be fully supported by current evidence. OCT coverage correlates with histological neointimal healing and endothelialization after stenting in animal models, [33][34][35] but its sensitivity and specificity in human atherosclerotic vessels are still unknown. OCT is not able to detect thin Values are presented as count (%).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to high spatial resolution OCT offers precise measurement of the neointimal thickness and distribution [9]. Additionally OCT enables assessment of tissue coverage of the each stent strut [10,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%