2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10006-020-00842-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of orthopantomograms in the assessment of implant position following alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While 2D imaging techniques like orthopantomograms are more accessible, 8,9 they suffer from inherent inaccuracies such as distortions, varying magnifications, and overlapping. 15 To overcome these limitations, conventional 3D computed tomography (CT) has been employed 16 ; however, this approach is considerably more expensive and exposes patients to higher radiation levels. Consequently, in recent years, techniques such as 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) have gained popularity due to their high accuracy while minimizing patient exposure to excessive radiation doses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While 2D imaging techniques like orthopantomograms are more accessible, 8,9 they suffer from inherent inaccuracies such as distortions, varying magnifications, and overlapping. 15 To overcome these limitations, conventional 3D computed tomography (CT) has been employed 16 ; however, this approach is considerably more expensive and exposes patients to higher radiation levels. Consequently, in recent years, techniques such as 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) have gained popularity due to their high accuracy while minimizing patient exposure to excessive radiation doses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies conducted on dry skulls suffer from a lack of information regarding the age and gender of the samples, which presents a challenge in interpreting their results. While 2D imaging techniques like orthopantomograms are more accessible, 8,9 they suffer from inherent inaccuracies such as distortions, varying magnifications, and overlapping 15 . To overcome these limitations, conventional 3D computed tomography (CT) has been employed 16 ; however, this approach is considerably more expensive and exposes patients to higher radiation levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%