Accuracy of patient-specific guided glenoid baseplate positioning for reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Levy, Jonathan C.; Everding, Nathan G.; Frankle, Mark A.; Keppler, Louis

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.051

Cited by 119 publications

(70 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The version is therefore measured with respect to the scapular plane, and inclination with respect to the neutral axis, as the angle between a line perpendicular to it and a line from the superior to inferior rim of the glenoid. 5 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…3 Surgical planning for these patients can be improved using three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of CT scans, but recreating that same plan at surgery can be difficult. 4,5 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…6-8 However, computer-assisted glenoid implantation techniques use an intra-operative setup using a tracking system, 6-9 with some disadvantages: instrumentation is cumbersome to use in the shoulder; pins used for array fixation may cause iatrogenic lesions such as fracture or neurovascular injury; registration of anatomical landmarks may be inaccurate; and the need for resetting may result in an increase in operative time of more than 20%. 5,7 Finally, tracking devices may loosen, giving unreliable information. 6 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1 It is the most recent development in this field, and its effectiveness in both the version and inclination planes of glenoid component placement has been demonstrated for both total anatomical and reverse shoulder arthroplasties. 1,5,10,11 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Patient-specific instrumentation for total shoulder arthroplasty

Gomes

2016

EFORT Open Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Shoulder arthroplasty is a demanding procedure with a known complication rate. Most complications are associated with the glenoid component, a fact that has stimulated investigation into that specific component of the implant. Avoiding glenoid component malposition is very important and is a key reason for recent developments in pre-operative planning and instrumentation to minimise risk.Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was developed as an alternative to navigation systems, originally for total knee arthroplasty, and is a valid option for shoulder replacements today. It offers increased accuracy in the placement of the glenoid component, which improves the likelihood of an optimal outcome.A description of the method of pre-operative planning and surgical technique is presented, based on the author’s experience and a review of the current literature.Cite this article: Gomes N. Patient-specific instrumentation for total shoulder arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:177-182. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000033.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…3 Surgical planning for these patients can be improved using three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of CT scans, but recreating that same plan at surgery can be difficult. 4,5 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Patient-specific instrumentation for total shoulder arthroplasty

Gomes

2016

EFORT Open Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This can offer insight to proper pin placement for glenoid implantation and positioning. The use of preoperative three-dimensional surgical simulation and patient-specific instrumentation can also be helpful [64][65][66].…”

Section: Glenoid Bone Lossmentioning

confidence: 99%

Management of complications after revision shoulder arthroplasty

Rahmi

Jawa

2015

Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Complications after revision shoulder arthroplasty are similar to those in the primary setting which include instability, fracture, bone loss, infection, nerve injury, and loosening. Unlike in the primary setting, however, the rate of complications for revisions is significantly greater and the management is more complex because of overlapping complications and limited treatment options. Furthermore, there is a paucity of evidence-based literature to direct the management options in these patients. The purposes of this review are to broadly outline the major complications that are seen in revision shoulder arthroplasty and to provide general principles on how to recognize and approach these complex cases.

show abstract