1980
DOI: 10.2166/nh.1980.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Point Precipitation Measurements

Abstract: The normal-exposed Hellmann raingauge only catches about 85% of the true precipitation on yearly basis. This is mainly due to aerodynamic effects. A statistical model analysing the ratio of the daily amounts of precipitation measured at ground level and at standard height is set up for describing this influence. Corrections due to liquid and solid precipitation and three different kind of exposures are presented. Further the statistical errors on the corrections are estimated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible explanations include both an overestimation of precipitation and an underestimation of the potential evapotranspiration. For the precipitation data the correction factors recommended by Allerup and Madsen (1979) had been substituted by new and higher correction factors (DMI, 1998). For potential evapotranspiration the original values based on the Makkink (1957) formulae had been replaced by values estimated by a modified Penman formula (Mikkelsen and Olesen, 1991) resulting in a decrease by up to 100 mm/year.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible explanations include both an overestimation of precipitation and an underestimation of the potential evapotranspiration. For the precipitation data the correction factors recommended by Allerup and Madsen (1979) had been substituted by new and higher correction factors (DMI, 1998). For potential evapotranspiration the original values based on the Makkink (1957) formulae had been replaced by values estimated by a modified Penman formula (Mikkelsen and Olesen, 1991) resulting in a decrease by up to 100 mm/year.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was assumed at the time that the gain was due to aerodynamics. At the same time, Folland (1988) was analysing the air flow round a standard 5 raingauge using numerical models and, based on this and on the field tests of Rodda (1967) and of Allerup and Madsen (1980), suggested a theoretical 'first-guess' shape for an improved aerodynamic raingauge. This present paper describes how the first-guess shape, used as a starting point, was made and tested against a standard 5 gauge and the new developments that followed, resulting in a raingauge with improved performance and a better understanding of the aerodynamic processes involved.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weather data were obtained from the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) as a 10x10 km grid covering the experimental site and corrected according to Allerup and Madsen (1980). Field management data were derived from the fertilizer plans elaborated for each field.…”
Section: Water Monitoring and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%