Accuracy of Power-Distribution Calculation Methods for Uranium and Plutonium Lattices

Ariemma, A.; Parola, G. Lesnoni La; Gualandi, M. Paoletti; Peroni, P.; Zaffiro, B.

doi:10.13182/nt70-a28661

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Accuracy In Burnup Predictions1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1973

1978

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Other1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…83 There was no estimate of the accuracy of experimental methods for this particular category, but data should not deviate significantly from that on an assembly-wise or local axial basis. 88 Similarly, a ±2.3% standard deviation was obtained in predictions of assembly-averaged power distribution for the Kewaunee reactor. 8 * For the San Onofre reactor, power distributions were measured experimentally by aeroball activation, and a ±6.2% standard deviation in assembly-averaged power distribution prediction was reported.…”

Section: Accuracy In Burnup Predictionsmentioning

confidence: 69%