2007
DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70052-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of procalcitonin for sepsis diagnosis in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
450
5
25

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 753 publications
(496 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
16
450
5
25
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of procalcitonin [64,144,145] or similar biomarkers may facilitate discontinuance of antibiotics in a patient with clinical improvement, although one recent study failed to show any benefit of daily procalcitonin measurement [146]. Table 4) should be rapidly referred to an intensive care unit (ICU) In 2004, the "Surviving Sepsis Campaign" guidelines recommended the use of EGDT [147] based on one large randomized trial [93].…”
Section: The Empirical Treatment Must Be Optimized When Microbiology mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of procalcitonin [64,144,145] or similar biomarkers may facilitate discontinuance of antibiotics in a patient with clinical improvement, although one recent study failed to show any benefit of daily procalcitonin measurement [146]. Table 4) should be rapidly referred to an intensive care unit (ICU) In 2004, the "Surviving Sepsis Campaign" guidelines recommended the use of EGDT [147] based on one large randomized trial [93].…”
Section: The Empirical Treatment Must Be Optimized When Microbiology mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Several meta-analyses have assessed procalcitonin as a marker of sepsis. [4][5][6][7][8][9] The fi ndings of these reports confl ict with regards to the association between procalcitonin and improved patient outcomes-eg, adequate treatment, mortality, or length of stay in the intensive-care unit. These discrepancies are probably a result of confounders such as treatment and population heterogeneity, diagnostic challenges related to identifi cation of the causative pathogens, absence of a true reference standard, the complexity of sepsis, diff erences in assay sensitivity, and shortcomings in the methods of the studies with inadequate statistical power to detect changes for hard endpoints.…”
Section: Procalcitonin As Diagnostic Biomarker Of Sepsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beispielsweise kommt eine Meta-Analyse von Tang et al zu dem Ergebnis, dass PCT keine eindeutige Differenzierung zwischen Sepsis und SIRS durch nicht-infekti ö se Ursachen erm ö glicht [99] . Diese unterschiedlichen Ergebnisse werden durch verschiedene Einschlusskriterien sowie andere Messmethoden erkl ä rt [103,104] .…”
Section: Bakterielle Infektionenunclassified